首页> 外文期刊>Toxicological sciences: An official journal of the Society of Toxicology >Roles of coactivator proteins in dioxin induction of CYP1A1 and CYP1B1 in human breast cancer cells.
【24h】

Roles of coactivator proteins in dioxin induction of CYP1A1 and CYP1B1 in human breast cancer cells.

机译:共激活蛋白在人乳腺癌细胞中二恶英诱导CYP1A1和CYP1B1的作用。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Cytochrome P450 (CYP) 1A1 and CYP1B1 are inducible by 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (dioxin) in the human breast cancer cell line, MCF-7. Since CYP1A1 was inducible to a much greater degree than CYP1B1, we hypothesized that there may be differences in coactivator recruitment to the promoter and/or enhancer regions of these genes. Dioxin treatment leads to recruitment of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor to the enhancer regions but not to the proximal promoter regions of both the CYP1A1 and CYP1B1 genes. On the other hand, dioxin treatment facilitated recruitment of RNA polymerase II to the promoters but not the enhancer regions. Dioxin treatment also elicited recruitment of the transcriptional coactivators, steroid receptor coactivator 1 (SRC-1) and steroid receptor coactivator 2 (SRC-2) and p300, which possess intrinsic histone acetyltranferase activities, to both genes, whereas Brahma (BRM)/Switch 2-related gene 1 (BRG-1), a subunit of nucleosomal remodeling factors, was recruited more robustly to CYP1A1 relative to CYP1B1. Small inhibitory RNA-mediated knockdown of p300 and SRC-2 adversely affected dioxin induction of both genes, whereas knockdown of BRM/BRG-1 reduced CYP1A1 induction but had little, if any, effect on CYP1B1 induction. These results suggest that nucleosomal remodeling is less significant for dioxin-mediated induction of CYP1B1 than that of CYP1A1 and may be related to the more modest inducibility of the former. Interestingly, simultaneous knockdown of SRC-2 and BRM/BRG-1 had no greater effect on CYP1A1 induction than knockdown of each coactivator individually, while simultaneous knockdown of p300 and BRM/BRG-1 had a much greater effect than knockdown of each individual gene, suggesting that the recruitment of SRC-2 to CYP1A1 depends upon BRM/BRG-1, while the recruitments of p300 and BRM/BRG-1 are independent of each other. These observations provide novel insights into the functional roles of the endogenous coactivators in dioxin induction of the human CYP1A1 and CYP1B1 genes in theirnatural chromosomal configurations.
机译:在人乳腺癌细胞系MCF-7中,细胞色素P450(CYP)1A1和CYP1B1可被2,3,7,8-四氯二苯并-p-二恶英(dioxin)诱导。由于CYP1A1的诱导程度比CYP1B1大得多,因此我们假设在这些基因的启动子和/或增强子区域的共激活子募集中可能存在差异。二恶英治疗导致芳烃受体募集到增强子区域,而不是CYP1A1和CYP1B1基因的近端启动子区域。另一方面,二恶英处理促进RNA聚合酶II募集到启动子而不是增强子区域。二恶英的治疗还引发了转录共激活因子,类固醇受体共激活因子1(SRC-1)和类固醇受体共激活因子2(SRC-2)和p300的募集,这两个基因具有固有的组蛋白乙酰转移酶活性,而梵天(BRM)/ Switch CYP1A1比CYP1B1更牢固地募集了2相关基因1(BRG-1),它是核小体重塑因子的一个亚基。小抑制性RNA介导的p300和SRC-2的敲低会对这两个基因的二恶英诱导产生不利影响,而敲低BRM / BRG-1会降低CYP1A1的诱导,但对CYP1B1的诱导几乎没有影响。这些结果表明,核小体重塑对二恶英介导的CYP1B1的诱导作用不如CYP1A1显着,并且可能与前者的适度诱导作用有关。有趣的是,同时敲除SRC-2和BRM / BRG-1对CYP1A1的诱导作用不比单独敲除每个共激活剂的影响大,而同时敲除p300和BRM / BRG-1的抑制作用比敲除每个单独的基因的影响大得多。 ,表明SRC-2向CYP1A1的募集依赖于BRM / BRG-1,而p300和BRM / BRG-1的募集彼此独立。这些观察提供了内源性共激活因子在天然色素构型的人CYP1A1和CYP1B1基因二恶英诱导中的功能性作用的新颖见解。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号