首页> 外文期刊>Theoretical and Applied Genetics: International Journal of Breeding Research and Cell Genetics >High-density genotyping: an overkill for QTL mapping? Lessons learned from a case study in maize and simulations.
【24h】

High-density genotyping: an overkill for QTL mapping? Lessons learned from a case study in maize and simulations.

机译:高密度基因分型:QTL映射的过大杀伤力?从玉米和模拟案例研究中学到的经验教训。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

High-density genotyping is extensively exploited in genome-wide association mapping studies and genomic selection in maize. By contrast, linkage mapping studies were until now mostly based on low-density genetic maps and theoretical results suggested this to be sufficient. This raises the question, if an increase in marker density would be an overkill for linkage mapping in biparental populations, or if important QTL mapping parameters would benefit from it. In this study, we addressed this question using experimental data and a simulation based on linkage maps with marker densities of 1, 2, and 5 cM. QTL mapping was performed for six diverse traits in a biparental population with 204 doubled haploid maize lines and in a simulation study with varying QTL effects and closely linked QTL for different population sizes. Our results showed that high-density maps neither improved the QTL detection power nor the predictive power for the proportion of explained genotypic variance. By contrast, the precision of QTL localization, the precision of effect estimates of detected QTL, especially for small and medium sized QTL, as well as the power to resolve closely linked QTL profited from an increase in marker density from 5 to 1 cM. In conclusion, the higher costs for high-density genotyping are compensated for by more precise estimates of parameters relevant for knowledge-based breeding, thus making an increase in marker density for linkage mapping attractive.
机译:高密度基因分型在玉米全基因组关联图谱研究和基因组选择中得到了广泛利用。相比之下,迄今为止,连锁作图研究主要基于低密度遗传图,理论结果表明这已经足够。这就提出了一个问题,如果标记密度的增加对于双亲群体中的连锁作图将是一个过大的杀伤力,还是重要的QTL作图参数将从中受益。在这项研究中,我们使用实验数据和基于标记密度分别为1、2和5 cM的连锁图的模拟来解决此问题。在具有204倍单倍体玉米品系的双亲种群中对六个不同性状进行了QTL定位,并在模拟研究中对QTL进行了不同的研究,并针对不同的种群大小紧密地联系了QTL。我们的结果表明,高密度图谱既不能提高QTL的检测能力,也不能提高解释基因型变异比例的预测能力。相比之下,QTL定位的精度,检测到的QTL的效果估计的精度(尤其是对于中小型QTL)以及解析紧密链接的QTL的能力都受益于标记密度从5 cM增加到1 cM。总之,通过与基于知识的育种有关的参数的更精确估计,可以补偿高密度基因分型的较高成本,从而使标记的密度增加,从而可以更好地进行连锁作图。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号