...
首页> 外文期刊>Thyroid: official journal of the American Thyroid Association >Prevalence of thyroid cancer in multinodular goiter versus single nodule: A systematic review and meta-Analysis
【24h】

Prevalence of thyroid cancer in multinodular goiter versus single nodule: A systematic review and meta-Analysis

机译:多结节性甲状腺肿与单结节甲状腺癌的患病率:系统评价和荟萃分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Background: Whether the prevalence of thyroid cancer is different in thyroid glands with a single nodule (SN) versus multinodular goiter (MNG) remains uncertain. Therefore, a meta-Analysis was performed to evaluate the extant literature on the comparative prevalence of thyroid cancer in SN compared with MNG. Methods: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, Cochrane Central, and reference list for selected observational, cross-sectional, and longitudinal studies evaluating thyroid cancer in SN and MNG. Toxic nodules were not included in the analysis. Two reviewers working independently extracted descriptive, methodological and outcome data from each study with consensus resolution of discrepancies. Meta-Analytic estimates of treatment effects were generated using a random-effect model. Results: Fourteen studies encompassing 23565 patients with MNG and 20723 patients with SN were eligible for inclusion. Most eligible studies were at a moderate risk of bias. MNGs were associated with a lower risk of thyroid cancer than SN (pooled odds ratio 0.8 [95% confidence interval 0.67-0.96]; I2=35%). Subgroup analysis suggested that this difference depends on the inclusion of studies conducted outside the United States (odds ratio 0.71 [95% confidence interval 0.60-0.83]; I2=11%). Conclusions: Thyroid cancer may be less frequent in MNG compared to SN, particularly outside the United States and perhaps in iodine-deficient areas.
机译:背景:单结节(SN)和多结节性甲状腺肿(MNG)在甲状腺中的甲状腺癌患病率是否不同尚不确定。因此,进行了荟萃分析,以评估现有文献中与MNG相比,SN中甲状腺癌的相对患病率。方法:我们在MEDLINE,EMBASE,Scopus,Cochrane Central和参考文献列表中进行了搜索,以选择评估SN和MNG中甲状腺癌的观察性,横断面和纵向研究。分析中不包括有毒结节。两名独立工作的审阅者从每个研究中提取了描述性,方法论和结果数据,并一致解决了差异。使用随机效应模型对治疗效果进行Meta分析评估。结果:纳入研究的14项研究包括23565例MNG患者和20723例SN患者。大多数合格的研究处于中等偏倚风险中。 MNGs与SN相比,甲状腺癌的风险更低(合并优势比为0.8 [95%置信区间0.67-0.96]; I2 = 35%)。亚组分析表明,这种差异取决于在美国以外进行的研究(优势比为0.71 [95%置信区间0.60-0.83]; I2 = 11%)。结论:与SN相比,MNG中甲状腺癌的发病率可能较低,尤其是在美国以外地区以及碘缺乏地区。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号