首页> 外文期刊>Thyroid: official journal of the American Thyroid Association >The diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy and the sonographic differences between benign and malignant thyroid nodules 3 cm or larger.
【24h】

The diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy and the sonographic differences between benign and malignant thyroid nodules 3 cm or larger.

机译:超声引导下细针穿刺活检的诊断准确性以及3 cm或更大的甲状腺良恶性甲状腺结节的超声检查差异。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

BACKGROUND: Although fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) is considered the standard for preoperative evaluation of thyroid nodules, the value of this has been questioned for large thyroid nodules. Here, we evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound-guided FNAB (US-FNAB) for thyroid nodules that were 3 cm or larger as well as the sonographic differences between benign and malignant nodules in this size group. MATERIALS AND METHODS: There were 661 thyroid masses equal to or larger than 3 cm who underwent US-FNAB from February 2002 to December 2006 and were included in this study. The cytology and surgical pathology readings in these patients were reviewed along with the ultrasonography features, the last from the retrospective review by one radiologist. Histopathology was used to calculate accuracy parameters for the US-FNAB cytology readings. In addition, the likely diagnoses for patients with a benign cytology reading were ascertained. RESULTS: Thyroid surgery was performed for 206 of the 661 nodules in the same number of patients (31.2%). All subjects who had inadequate, indeterminate, or suspicious for malignancy cytology readings had thyroid surgery. All of the patients who did not have thyroid surgery were considered likely to have benign disease because of their initial cytology reading and follow-up, and finally, 587 (88.8%) were benign and 74 (11.2%) were malignant. When considering malignant, suspicious for malignancy, and indeterminate cytology readings as positive and benign cytology as negative, the sensitivity was 96.7%, specificity 85.9%, positive predictive value 76.6%, negative predictive value 98.2%, and accuracy 89.4%. Ultrasonography features of malignancy were more prevalent in thyroid nodules that were malignant compared with those that were benign or considered likely to be benign (70.3% vs. 1.2%, p < 0.001), and ultrasonography features of a benign nodule were more prevalent in thyroid nodules that were benign or considered likely to be benign than those that were malignant (94.9% vs. 29.7%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: In this study, US-FNAB appeared to be a relatively accurate method to evaluate thyroid nodules larger than 3 cm, with false-negative rates of about 2%. Much larger series would be required to determine its utility in this setting.
机译:背景:尽管细针穿刺活检(FNAB)被认为是术前评估甲状腺结节的标准,但对于大型甲状腺结节,其价值还是值得质疑的。在这里,我们评估了超声引导的FNAB(US-FNAB)对3 cm或更大的甲状腺结节的诊断准确性,以及该大小组中良性和恶性结节的超声检查差异。材料与方法:从2002年2月至2006年12月,对661例等于或大于3厘米的甲状腺肿块进行了US-FNAB手术,并纳入研究。回顾了这些患者的细胞学和手术病理学读数以及超声检查特征,最后一次是由一名放射科医生回顾性回顾的。组织病理学用于计算US-FNAB细胞学读数的准确性参数。另外,确定了具有良性细胞学读数的患者的可能诊断。结果:在相同数量的患者中,对661个结节中的206个进行了甲状腺手术(31.2%)。所有恶性细胞学读数不足,不确定或可疑的受试者均进行了甲状腺手术。所有未进行甲状腺手术的患者均因其最初的细胞学检查和随访而被认为可能患有良性疾病,最后,良性疾病为587(88.8%),恶性为74(11.2%)。当考虑恶性,可疑恶性和不确定的细胞学读数为阳性而良性细胞学为阴性时,敏感性为96.7%,特异性为85.9%,阳性预测值为76.6%,阴性预测值为98.2%,准确度为89.4%。与良性或被认为可能是良性的甲状腺结节相比,恶性的超声检查特征更为普遍(70.3%vs. 1.2%,p <0.001),良性结节的超声检查特征普遍存在于甲状腺与恶性结节相比,良性结节或被认为可能是良性结节(94.9%vs. 29.7%,p <0.001)。结论:在本研究中,US-FNAB似乎是一种相对准确的评估3厘米以上甲状腺结节的方法,假阴性率约为2%。在这种情况下,需要更大的系列才能确定其效用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号