首页> 外文期刊>Thyroid: official journal of the American Thyroid Association >Optimization of a New Mass Spectrometry Method for Measurement of Breast Milk Iodine Concentrations and an Assessment of the Effect of Analytic Method and Timing of Within-Feed Sample Collection on Breast Milk Iodine Concentrations
【24h】

Optimization of a New Mass Spectrometry Method for Measurement of Breast Milk Iodine Concentrations and an Assessment of the Effect of Analytic Method and Timing of Within-Feed Sample Collection on Breast Milk Iodine Concentrations

机译:新型测定母乳中碘浓度的质谱方法的优化,以及分析方法和进料内采样时间对母乳中碘浓度的影响的评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: Breast milk iodine concentration (BMIC) may be an indicator of iodine status during lactation, but there are few data comparing different analytical methods or timing of sampling. The aims of this study were: (i) to optimize a new inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) method; and (ii) to evaluate the effect of analytical method and timing of within-feed sample collection on BMIC. Methods: The colorimetric Sandell-Kolthoff method was evaluated with (a) or without (b) alkaline ashing, and ICP-MS was evaluated using a new I-129 isotope ratio approach including Tellurium (Te) for mass bias correction (c) or external standard curve (d). From iodine-sufficient lactating women (n=97), three samples were collected within one breast-feeding session (fore-, mid-, and hind-feed samples) and BMIC was analyzed using (c) and (d). Results: Iodine recovery from NIST SRM1549a whole milk powder for methods (a)-(d) was 67%, 24%, 105%, and 102%, respectively. Intra- and inter-assay coefficients of variation for ICP-MS comparing (c) and (d) were 1.3% versus 5.6% (p=0.04) and 1.1% versus 2.4% (p=0.33). The limit of detection (LOD) was lower for (c) (0.26g/kg) than it was for (d) (2.54g/kg; p=0.02). Using (c), the median [95% confidence interval (CI) obtained by bootstrap] BMIC (g/kg) in foremilk (179 [CI 161-206]) and in mid-feed milk (184 [CI 160-220]) were not significantly different (p=0.017), but were higher than in hindmilk (175 [CI 153-216]; p<0.001). In foremilk using (d), BMIC was 199 ([CI 182-257]; p<0.001 vs. (c)). The variation in BMIC comparing (c) and (d) (13%) was greater than variation within feeding (5%; p<0.001). Conclusions: Because of poor recoveries, (a) and (b) should not be used to measure BMIC. Compared with (d), (c) has the advantages of higher precision and a lower LOD. In iodine-sufficient women, BMIC shows low variation within a breast-feeding session, so timing of sampling is not a major determinant of BMIC.
机译:背景:母乳中的碘浓度(BMIC)可能是哺乳期间碘状态的指标,但是很少有数据比较不同的分析方法或采样时间。这项研究的目的是:(i)优化一种新的电感耦合等离子体质谱法(ICP-MS); (ii)评估分析方法和进料内采样时间对BMIC的影响。方法:使用(a)或不使用(b)碱灰法评估比色Sandell-Kolthoff方法,并使用新的I-129同位素比率方法(包括碲(Te))对ICP-MS进行质量偏倚校正(c)或外标曲线(d)。从一次有碘喂养的哺乳期妇女(n = 97)中,在一次母乳喂养时段内收集了三个样品(前,中和后喂养样品),并使用(c)和(d)分析了BMIC。结果:方法(a)-(d)从NIST SRM1549a全脂奶粉中回收的碘分别为67%,24%,105%和102%。比较(c)和(d)的ICP-MS测定内和测定间变异系数为1.3%对5.6%(p = 0.04)和1.1%对2.4%(p = 0.33)。 (c)(0.26g / kg)的检出限(LOD)低于(d)(2.54g / kg; p = 0.02)的检出限。使用(c),前半身(179 [CI 161-206])和中喂奶(184 [CI 160-220])的BMIC(g / kg)中值[通过引导程序获得的置信区间(CI)] )没有显着差异(p = 0.017),但高于后奶(175 [CI 153-216]; p <0.001)。在使用(d)的前人中,BMIC为199([CI 182-257];相对于(c)p <0.001)。比较(c)和(d)的BMIC变化(13%)大于进食期间的变化(5%; p <0.001)。结论:由于回收率差,不应使用(a)和(b)来测量BMIC。与(d)相比,(c)具有较高的精度和较低的LOD的优点。在有碘的妇女中,BMIC在母乳喂养期间的变异很小,因此采样时间并不是BMIC的主要决定因素。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号