...
首页> 外文期刊>Thrombosis Research: An International Journal on Vascular Obstruction, Hemorrhage and Hemostasis >Differential effects of low molecular weight heparin and unfractionated heparin on circulating levels of antithrombin and tissue factor pathway inhibitor (TFPI): a possible mechanism for difference in therapeutic efficacy.
【24h】

Differential effects of low molecular weight heparin and unfractionated heparin on circulating levels of antithrombin and tissue factor pathway inhibitor (TFPI): a possible mechanism for difference in therapeutic efficacy.

机译:低分子量肝素和普通肝素对抗凝血酶和组织因子途径抑制剂(TFPI)循环水平的差异作用:治疗功效差异的可能机制。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

There is growing evidence on the superior efficacy and safety of low molecular weight heparins (LMWHs) over unfractionated heparin (UFH) for the treatment of both venous and arterial thromboembolism. Heparin exerts its function by potentiating antithrombin and by mobilizing tissue factor pathway inhibitor (TFPI) into the circulation. The present study was conducted to compare the effect of subcutaneous LMWH and infusion of UFH on these two anticoagulants in plasma. Eighteen healthy male volunteers were randomly allocated to therapy with continuous intravenous (iv) UFH (n=6) (initial infusion rate 450 IU/kg/day) or low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) (enoxaparin, 1.5 mg/kg/day) subcutaneously (sc) once daily for 72 hours. Free TFPI antigen, measured by a solid-phase two-site enzyme immunoassay, and antithrombin and protein C activities, measured by chromogenic assays, were assessed in plasma samples before, during, and after anticoagulant treatment. Infusion of UFH, but not subcutaneous LMWH, was found to attenuate the antithrombotic defense by a selective decrease of both circulating antithrombin (-21+/-7%, p<0.0001) and of free and endothelial-bound TFPI. The changes in antithrombin and TFPI by LMWH and UFH were statistically different between groups (p<0.001). The differential effect of UFH and LMWH on antithrombin and TFPI may explain the superior efficacy of subcutaneous LMWH compared with conventional intravenous UFH for treatment of both arterial and venous thrombosis.
机译:越来越多的证据表明,低分子量肝素(LMWH)在治疗静脉和动脉血栓栓塞方面优于普通肝素(UFH)。肝素通过增强抗凝血酶和动员组织因子途径抑制剂(TFPI)进入循环而发挥其功能。本研究旨在比较皮下LMWH和输注UFH对血浆中这两种抗凝剂的影响。 18名健康男性志愿者被随机分配接受连续静脉(iv)UFH(n = 6)(初始输注速率450 IU / kg /天)或低分子量肝素(LMWH)(依诺肝素,1.5 mg / kg /天)治疗皮下(sc)每天一次,持续72小时。在抗凝剂治疗之前,期间和之后,通过固相两点酶免疫测定法测定游离的TFPI抗原,并通过生色测定法测定抗凝血酶和蛋白C的活性。发现输注UFH而非皮下LMWH可通过选择性降低循环中的抗凝血酶(-21 +/- 7%,p <0.0001)以及游离和内皮结合的TFPI来减弱抗血栓形成的防御能力。 LMWH和UFH的抗凝血酶和TFPI的变化在各组之间具有统计学差异(p <0.001)。 UFH和LMWH对抗凝血酶和TFPI的不同作用可能解释了皮下LMWH与常规静脉UFH在治疗动脉和静脉血栓形成方面的优越疗效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号