首页> 外文期刊>Thrombosis Research: An International Journal on Vascular Obstruction, Hemorrhage and Hemostasis >The clinical significance of anti-prothrombin antibodies for risk assessment of thromboembolism in patients with lupus anticoagulant.
【24h】

The clinical significance of anti-prothrombin antibodies for risk assessment of thromboembolism in patients with lupus anticoagulant.

机译:抗凝血酶原抗体对狼疮抗凝剂患者血栓栓塞风险评估的临床意义。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

INTRODUCTION: Thromboembolism is a common manifestation of lupus anticoagulant (LA), however only a subgroup of LA-patients is affected by thrombosis. Study objective was to investigate whether anti-prothrombin antibodies can identify LA-patients at increased risk for thrombosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In total 79 patients, 50 with (42 men/8 women) and 29 without thrombosis (21 men/8 women), were investigated for their presence of anti-prothrombin IgG and IgM antibodies using assays from two different manufacturers (Aeskulisa=assay I, CoaChrom=assay II). RESULTS: The prevalence of elevated levels of anti-prothrombin IgG, IgM as well as IgG and/or IgM antibodies was 66% [assayI] (36% [assayII]), 38% (24%) and 72% (50%) in patients with thrombosis and 55% (24%), 28% (28%) and 66% (41%) in patients without thrombosis, respectively. Neither anti-prothrombin IgG or IgM nor IgG and/or IgM antibodies were found to indicate an increased risk for thrombosis. In the subgroup of patients with arterial or venous thrombosis there was also no association between anti-prothrombin antibodies and thrombosis. The comparison of median levels of IgG and IgM anti-prothrombin antibodies between patients with and without thrombosis yielded a borderline statistically significant difference only for anti-prothrombin IgG antibodies by using assay II (p=0.033), all other comparisons were not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, presence of anti-prothrombin antibodies was not associated with thromboembolism in LA-patients.
机译:简介血栓栓塞症是狼疮抗凝剂(LA)的常见表现,但是只有一部分LA患者会受到血栓形成的影响。研究目的是研究抗凝血酶原抗体是否可以鉴定出LA患者的血栓形成风险增加。材料与方法:使用来自两个不同制造商的检测方法,对总共79例患者(其中50例(42名男性/ 8名女性)和29例无血栓形成(21名男性/ 8名女性)的患者进行了抗凝血酶原IgG和IgM抗体的检测( Aeskulisa =测定I,CoaChrom =测定II)。结果:抗凝血酶原IgG,IgM以及IgG和/或IgM抗体水平升高的发生率分别为66%[assayI](36%[assayII]),38%(24%)和72%(50%)血栓形成的患者分别为55%(24%),无血栓形成的患者28%(28%)和66%(41%)。未发现抗凝血酶原IgG或IgM或IgG和/或IgM抗体均未表明血栓形成的风险增加。在患有动脉或静脉血栓形成的患者亚组中,抗凝血酶原抗体与血栓形成之间也没有关联。使用和不使用血栓形成的患者之间的IgG和IgM抗凝血酶原抗体的中位水平比较仅通过测定II得出抗凝血酶原IgG抗体的统计学显着性差异(p = 0.033),所有其他比较均无统计学意义。结论:总之,抗凝血酶原抗体的存在与LA患者的血栓栓塞无关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号