...
首页> 外文期刊>Thrombosis Research: An International Journal on Vascular Obstruction, Hemorrhage and Hemostasis >Clinical probability assessment and D-dimer determination in patients with suspected deep vein thrombosis, a prospective multicenter management study.
【24h】

Clinical probability assessment and D-dimer determination in patients with suspected deep vein thrombosis, a prospective multicenter management study.

机译:疑似深静脉血栓形成的患者的临床概率评估和D-二聚体测定,一项前瞻性多中心管理研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the reliability of a combined strategy of clinical assessment score followed by a local D-dimer test to exclude deep vein thrombosis. For comparison D-dimer was analysed post hoc and batchwise at a coagulation laboratory. DESIGN: Prospective multicenter management study. SETTING: Seven hospitals in southern Sweden. SUBJECTS: 357 patients with a suspected first episode of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) were prospectively recruited and pre-test probability score (Wells score) was estimated by the emergency physician. If categorized as low pre-test probability, D-dimer was analysed and if negative, DVT was considered to be ruled out. The primary outcome was recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) during 3 months of follow up. RESULTS: Prevalence of DVT was 23.5% (84/357). A low pre-test probability and a negative D-dimer result at inclusion was found in 31% (110/357) of the patients of whom one (0.9%, [95% CI 0.02-4.96]) had a VTE at follow up. Sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value and negative likelihood ratio for our local D-dimer test in the low probability group were 85.7%, 74.5%, 98.2%, and 0,19 respectively compared to 85.6%, 67,6%, 97.9% and 0,23 using batchwise analysis at a coagulation laboratory. CONCLUSION: Pre-test probability score and D-dimer safely rule out DVT in about 30% of outpatients with a suspected first episode of DVT. One out of 110 patients was diagnosed with DVT during follow up. No significant difference in diagnostic performance was seen between local D-dimer test and the post hoc batch analysis with the same reagent in the low probability group.
机译:目的:探讨临床评估评分结合局部D-二聚体试验排除深静脉血栓形成的综合策略的可靠性。为了比较,在凝血实验室事后和分批分析了D-二聚体。设计:前瞻性多中心管理研究。地点:瑞典南部的七家医院。研究对象:357名疑似首发深静脉血栓形成(DVT)的患者被前瞻性招募,急诊医师评估了预测试概率评分(Wells评分)。如果分类为低预测试概率,则分析D-二聚体;如果为阴性,则认为DVT被排除。主要结果是随访3个月内复发性静脉血栓栓塞(VTE)。结果:DVT的患病率为23.5%(84/357)。在31%(110/357)的患者中,有1名(0.9%,[95%CI 0.02-4.96])随访时发生VTE,发现预检率低且D-二聚体结果阴性。低概率组中本地D-二聚体检测的敏感性,特异性,阴性预测值和阴性似然比分别为85.7%,74.5%,98.2%和0,19,而相比之下分别为85.6%,67.6%,97.9%和0,23在混凝实验室使用分批分析。结论:大约30%的疑似DVT首发门诊患者中,测试前概率评分和D-二聚体安全地排除了DVT。在随访期间,每110名患者中就有1名被诊断出患有DVT。在低概率组中,本地D-二聚体试验与事后批次分析中使用相同试剂的诊断性能无明显差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号