...
首页> 外文期刊>Thrombosis and Haemostasis: Journal of the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis >Agonists of toll-like receptor (TLR)2 and TLR4 are unable to modulate platelet activation by adenosine diphosphate and platelet activating factor.
【24h】

Agonists of toll-like receptor (TLR)2 and TLR4 are unable to modulate platelet activation by adenosine diphosphate and platelet activating factor.

机译:Toll样受体(TLR)2和TLR4的激动剂不能通过二磷酸腺苷和血小板活化因子来调节血小板活化。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Inappropriate platelet activation is a feature of acute and chronic diseases such as disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) and atherosclerosis. Since proinflammatory microbial-derived agonists can be involved in the pathogenesis of these diseases, we examined the potential role of TLR4 (mediating responses to LPS) and TLR2 (which responds to bacterial lipopeptides) in platelet activation. Our data suggested low-level expression of TLR2 and TLR4 on platelets, determined by flow cytometry, and we also observed expression of TLR4 on a megakaryocytic cell line by both flow cytometry and immunohistochemistry. Stimulation of the platelets with the TLR4 agonist LPS, and the synthetic TLR2 agonist Pam3CSK4, resulted in no platelet aggregation, no increase in CD62P surface expression and no increase in the cytosolic concentration of Ca2+. The TLR agonists were also unable to directly activate platelets primed with epinephrine, or pretreated with a low concentration of ADP or PAF. Pretreatment of platelets with LPS or Pam3CSK4 also failed to modulate the platelet response to submaximal concentrations of the classical platelet agonists ADP and PAF. We conclude that the TLR agonists LPS and Pam3CSK4 have no direct effect on platelet activation and that platelet TLRs may be a remnant from megakaryocytes. TLR2 and TLR4 agonists are thought to have a significant role in diseases such as atherosclerosis and DIC, but our research suggests that this is through a mechanism other than direct platelet activation or by modification of platelet responses to other agonists.
机译:血小板活化不当是急性和慢性疾病的特征,例如弥散性血管内凝血(DIC)和动脉粥样硬化。由于促炎性微生物衍生的激动剂可能与这些疾病的发病机理有关,因此我们研究了TLR4(介导对LPS的应答)和TLR2(对细菌脂肽的应答)在血小板活化中的潜在作用。我们的数据表明通过流式细胞术确定血小板上TLR2和TLR4的低水平表达,并且我们还通过流式细胞术和免疫组织化学观察到巨核细胞系中TLR4的表达。用TLR4激动剂LPS和合成的TLR2激动剂Pam3CSK4刺激血小板,不会导致血小板聚集,CD62P表面表达不会增加,胞质Ca2 +浓度也不会增加。 TLR激动剂也不能直接激活用肾上腺素引发的血小板,或用低浓度的ADP或PAF预处理的血小板。用LPS或Pam3CSK4预处理血小板也未能调节血小板对最大浓度的经典血小板激动剂ADP和PAF的反应。我们得出的结论是,TLR激动剂LPS和Pam3CSK4对血小板活化没有直接作用,并且血小板TLRs可能是巨核细胞的残留物。 TLR2和TLR4激动剂被认为在诸如动脉粥样硬化和DIC之类的疾病中具有重要作用,但我们的研究表明,这是通过直接激活血小板以外的机制或通过修饰血小板对其他激动剂的反应而实现的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号