首页> 外文期刊>Therapeutic Drug Monitoring >Psychiatrists′ perspectives on antipsychotic dose and the role of plasma concentration therapeutic drug monitoring
【24h】

Psychiatrists′ perspectives on antipsychotic dose and the role of plasma concentration therapeutic drug monitoring

机译:精神科医生对抗精神病药物剂量的看法以及血浆浓度治疗药物监测的作用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Background: Why psychiatrists choose a particular dose of antipsychotic for an individual patient with schizophrenia is unknown. This study aimed to investigate consultant psychiatrists' perspectives on the dose titration and their attitudes towards therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) for antipsychotics. Method: A cross-sectional quantitative questionnaire study of consultant psychiatrists based in London was conducted. A new questionnaire was developed, in part, based on the findings from focus groups. Themes included dose choice, titration, switching, and the pros and cons of TDM use. Results: For 105 consultant psychiatrists, choice of antipsychotic was most influenced by perceived side-effects/tolerance (63.8%). When choosing an optimum dose, most based this on their past clinical experience of patients presenting in a similar way (80.0%), perspectives on the equivalent doses of 2 antipsychotics (69.5%), or the individual patient's stated dose preference (61.9%). Factors thought to warrant a lower dose (eg, first episode psychosis) were consistent with a former study, and 59.0% of the clinicians believed it acceptable to switch antipsychotics ≥4 per year. The majority of clinicians currently routinely use TDM for clozapine (82.9%), and previous use of TDM for clozapine was found to predict likely future use of TDM with antipsychotics (χ2 = 5.51, P = 0.019). Furthermore, clinicians agreed that TDM could assist in minimizing the risk of dose-related side effects (77.1%). However, 32.4% did not agree that TDM would improve clinical outcomes. Overall, there was a positive attitude towards TDM for antipsychotics, and almost all clinicians (84.8%, 95% confidence interval, 77.9-91.7) would use it if widely available. Conclusions: Current prescribing decisions regarding antipsychotic dose are mainly influenced by clinician intuition, previous experience, and patient preference. Although some expressed concerns regarding the evidence base, most clinicians reported that they would use TDM for antipsychotics if readily available.
机译:背景:精神科医生为何为精神分裂症患者选择特定剂量的抗精神病药尚不清楚。这项研究旨在调查心理医生对剂量滴定的看法以及他们对抗精神病药的治疗药物监测(TDM)的态度。方法:对伦敦咨询精神病医生进行了横断面定量问卷研究。根据焦点小组的调查结果,部分开发了新的调查表。主题包括剂量选择,滴定,切换以及使用TDM的利弊。结果:对于105名顾问精神病医生,抗精神病药物的选择受感知的副作用/耐受性的影响最大(63.8%)。选择最佳剂量时,大多数情况是基于他们过去以类似方式就诊的患者的临床经验(80.0%),对两种抗精神病药的等效剂量的观点(69.5%)或个别患者陈述的剂量偏爱(61.9%) 。被认为可以降低剂量的因素(例如,首发精神病)与以前的研究一致,并且59.0%的临床医生认为每年更换≥4种抗精神病药是可以接受的。目前,大多数临床医生常规将氯丁酸用于TDM(占82.9%),而以前对氯氮平使用TDM可以预测抗精神病药在将来可能使用TDM(χ2= 5.51,P = 0.019)。此外,临床医生同意,TDM可以帮助将与剂量相关的副作用的风险降到最低(77.1%)。但是,32.4%的人不同意TDM可以改善临床结局。总体而言,对于抗精神病药,TDM持积极态度,并且几乎所有临床医生(84.8%,95%置信区间,77.9-91.7)都可以使用它。结论:目前有关抗精神病药物剂量的处方决定主要受临床医生的直觉,既往经验和患者喜好影响。尽管一些人对证据基础表示担忧,但大多数临床医生报告说,如果有可能,他们将使用TDM进行抗精神病药物治疗。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号