首页> 外文期刊>Theory in biosciences >Sensory exploitation and cultural transmission: the late emergence of iconic representations in human evolution
【24h】

Sensory exploitation and cultural transmission: the late emergence of iconic representations in human evolution

机译:感官剥削和文化传播:人类进化中标志性表示的晚期出现

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Iconic representations (i.e., figurative imagery and realistic art) only started to appear consistently some 45,000 years ago, although humans have been anatomically modern since 200,000–160,000 years ago. What explains this? Some authors have suggested a neurocognitive change took place, leading to a creative explosion, although this has been contested. Here, we examine the hypothesis that demographic changes caused cultural ‘‘cumulative adaptive evolution’’ and as such the emergence of modern symbolic behavior. This approach usefully explains the evolution of utilitarian skills and tools, and the creation of symbols to identify groups. However, it does not equally effectively explain the evolution of behaviors that may not be directly adaptive, such as the production of iconic representations like figurines and rock art. In order to shed light on their emergence, we propose to combine the above-mentioned cultural hypothesis with the concept of sensory exploitation. The concept essentially states that behavioral traits (in this case iconic art production) which exploit pre-existing sensory sensitivities will evolve if not hindered by costs (i.e., natural selection). In this view, iconic art traditions are evolved by piggybacking on cumulative adaptive evolution. Since it is to date uncertain whether art has served any adaptive function in human evolution, parsimony demands paying more attention to the primary and afunctional mechanism of sensory exploitation as opposed to mechanisms of models based exclusively on secondary benefits (such as Miller’s, for instance, in which art is proposed to evolve as a sexual display of fitness).
机译:尽管人类自20万至160,000年前在解剖学上是现代的,但标志性表示(即,象征性图像和写实艺术)才开始持续出现在大约45,000年前。是什么解释了这一点?一些作者认为发生了神经认知改变,导致了创造性的爆炸,尽管这已经引起了争议。在这里,我们考察了人口变化导致文化“累积适应性进化”以及现代象征行为出现的假设。这种方法有用地解释了功利技能和工具的发展,以及用于识别群体的符号的创建。然而,它并不能同样有效地解释可能不是直接适应的行为的演变,例如像小雕像和岩石艺术之类的标志性作品的产生。为了阐明它们的出现,我们建议将上述文化假设与感官剥削概念结合起来。该概念本质上说,利用既有的感官敏感性的行为特征(在这种情况下,是标志性艺术品的生产)将在不受成本(即自然选择)限制的情况下发展。在这种观点下,标志性艺术传统是通过piggy带累积适应性进化而发展起来的。由于至今尚不确定艺术是否在人类进化中发挥了任何适应性功能,简约性要求更多地关注感官开发的主要和功能性机制,而不是仅基于次要利益的模型机制(例如,米勒(Miller),其中提出了将艺术发展为适合性的展示)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号