首页> 外文期刊>Therapeutic Drug Monitoring >Comparing 3 methods of monitoring gentamicin concentrations in patients with febrile neutropenia.
【24h】

Comparing 3 methods of monitoring gentamicin concentrations in patients with febrile neutropenia.

机译:比较3种监测发热性中性粒细胞减少症患者庆大霉素浓度的方法。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Several nomograms and algorithms have been developed to individualize pharmacokinetic monitoring with their own advantages and disadvantages. This study compared 3 pharmacokinetic methods for predicting doses and monitoring of gentamicin in adult patients with febrile neutropenia. A retrospective study of 75 patients with febrile neutropenia was conducted at the Royal Adelaide Hospital, South Australia. Each patient received a course of once-daily gentamicin and had 2 sets of paired gentamicin serum concentrations. Pharmacokinetic parameters and ensuing doses were compared using 3 pharmacokinetic methods: (1) sequential Bayesian algorithm for gentamicin (SeBA-GEN), (2) Sawchuk-Zaske, and (3) Therapeutic Guidelines: Antibiotic Dose Adjustment Nomogram. The initial median (range) dose of gentamicin administered was 400 (240-640) mg. SeBA-GEN and Sawchuk-Zaske methods recommended similar subsequent gentamicin dose adjustments of 400 (280-640) mg and 400 (280-640) mg, respectively, whereas the Therapeutic Guidelines recommended an increase to 1390 (210-6240) mg. For the Therapeutic Guidelines, 64% of the patients had measured serum gentamicin concentrations that were below the minimum line of the nomogram for the first set of concentrations with only 32% of these patients having an area under the curve value of <70 mg h/L as calculated by SeBA-GEN. The SeBA-GEN method showed a statistically significant increase (68%-77%) in patients attaining the target concentrations of maximum concentration (Cmax) 15-25 mg/L compared with the Sawchuk-Zaske method (72%-65%, P > 0.05). SeBA-GEN also demonstrated greater precision in predicting the area under the curve, Cmax, and minimum concentration (Cmin) compared with the Sawchuk-Zaske method. In conclusion, as the Bayesian approach, that is, SeBA-GEN demonstrated greater precision and more patients were attaining the target concentrations, it is therefore the preferred method for gentamicin monitoring in patients with febrile neutropenia.
机译:已经开发了几种列线图和算法,以利用各自的优点和缺点来个性化药代动力学监测。这项研究比较了3种药代动力学方法对成年发热性中性粒细胞减少症患者的庆大霉素剂量预测和监测。在南澳大利亚州皇家阿德莱德医院进行了75例发热性中性粒细胞减少症患者的回顾性研究。每例患者接受一个每日一次的庆大霉素疗程,并有两组成对的庆大霉素血清浓度。使用3种药代动力学方法比较了药代动力学参数和后续剂量:(1)庆大霉素的顺序贝叶斯算法(SeBA-GEN),(2)Sawchuk-Zaske和(3)治疗指南:抗生素剂量调整法。庆大霉素的初始中位(范围)剂量为400(240-640)mg。 SeBA-GEN和Sawchuk-Zaske方法建议对庆大霉素进行类似的后续剂量调整,分别为400(280-640)mg和400(280-640)mg,而《治疗指南》建议增加至1390(210-6240)mg。根据《治疗指南》,有64%的患者血清庆大霉素浓度低于第一组浓度列线图的最小线,其中只有32%的患者的曲线值小于70 mg h /由SeBA-GEN计算得出的L。与Sawchuk-Zaske方法(72%-65%,P)相比,SeBA-GEN方法显示达到最大浓度(Cmax)15-25 mg / L的目标浓度的患者统计学上显着增加(68%-77%) > 0.05)。与Sawchuk-Zaske方法相比,SeBA-GEN在预测曲线下面积,Cmax和最小浓度(Cmin)方面也显示出更高的精度。总之,由于贝叶斯方法(即SeBA-GEN)显示出更高的精确度,并且有更多的患者达到了目标浓度,因此,这是监测发热性中性粒细胞减少症患者庆大霉素的首选方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号