...
首页> 外文期刊>Thoracic cancer. >Comparison of short and long-term results between sleeve resection and pneumonectomy in lung cancer patients over 70 years old: 10 years experience from a single institution in China
【24h】

Comparison of short and long-term results between sleeve resection and pneumonectomy in lung cancer patients over 70 years old: 10 years experience from a single institution in China

机译:70岁以上肺癌患者套管切除术和肺切除术短期和长期结果的比较:来自中国一家机构的10年经验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: The aim of this study was to compare the short and long-term results between sleeve resection (SR) and pneumonectomy (PN) in lung cancer patients over 70 years of age. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 105 lung cancer patients over 70 years of age who had undergone SR or PN at Shanghai Chest Hospital from January 2003 to December 2012. Results: The SR group showed a higher frequency of airway clearance via bronchoscopy (48.6% vs. 25.7%, P = 0.04), longer surgical time (162.7 vs. 140.9 minutes, P = 0.01), and shorter postoperative stay (13.7 vs. 18.1 days, P = 0.02) than the PN group. There was no difference in hospital mortality (P = 1.00) or morbidity (P = 0.40) between the two groups. A logistic regression model showed that preoperative predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 second was the only independent risk factor for overall morbidity (P = 0.04). In survival analysis, SR showed better prognosis than PN (median 50.0 vs. 20.0 months, P < 0.01). In subgroup analysis, SR showed better survival in N0 (P = 0.03) and N1 (P < 0.01) cases, but not in N2 cases (P = 0.36). It also showed better survival in stage I + II patients (P = 0.03), but not in stage III patients (P = 0.10). Conclusions: Although PN could be carried out as safely as SR in patients over 70 years of age with a good pulmonary reservoir, SR is still recommended as a less traumatic procedure, sparing lung parenchyma with better long-term results.
机译:背景:本研究的目的是比较70岁以上肺癌患者的套管切除(SR)和肺切除术(PN)之间的短期和长期结果。方法:我们回顾性回顾了2003年1月至2012年12月在上海胸科医院接受过SR或PN治疗的70岁以上的105例肺癌患者。结果:SR组显示通过支气管镜检查清除气道的频率更高(48.6%vs。与PN组相比,手术时间延长了25.7%,P = 0.04),手术时间更长(162.7对140.9分钟,P = 0.01),术后住院时间短(13.7对18.1天,P = 0.02)。两组的医院死亡率(P = 1.00)或发病率(P = 0.40)没有差异。 Logistic回归模型显示,术前1秒钟的预计强制呼气量是整体发病率的唯一独立危险因素(P = 0.04)。在生存分析中,SR的预后比PN好(中位数50.0 vs. 20.0个月,P <0.01)。在亚组分析中,SR在N0(P = 0.03)和N1(P <0.01)病例中显示更好的存活率,但在N2病例(P = 0.36)中没有。在I + II期患者中也显示了更好的生存率(P = 0.03),而在III期患者中则没有(P = 0.10)。结论:尽管对于70岁以上肺功能良好的患者,PN可以像SR一样安全地进行,但仍推荐使用SR作为创伤小,肺实质少,长期效果更好的方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号