首页> 外文期刊>The Philippine Agricultural Scientist >Compost Quality and Economic Viability of Five Biowaste Composting Ventures in Metro Manila
【24h】

Compost Quality and Economic Viability of Five Biowaste Composting Ventures in Metro Manila

机译:马尼拉大都会的五家生物垃圾堆肥企业的堆肥质量和经济可行性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The compost quality and economic viability of five urban biowaste composting ventures in Metro Manila, Philippines were studied. The study sites which were chosen to represent the composting of biodegradable waste collected from the market, householdand school included: a) the Pasig City Market; b) Barangay (Bgy) Holy Spirit, Quezon City; c) Bgy. Concepcion Uno, Marikina City; d) Bgy. 169, Caloocan City; and e) ParefWoodrose School, Inc., Muntinlupa City. Compost from Bgy 169 passed the Fertilizer and Pesticide Authority (FPA) standard for compost or soil conditioner. Chemical analyses showed that the compost had a C:N ratio of 21 and contained 39% organic matter, 1.08% total N, 0.81 % P as P_2O_5 and 1.58% K as K_2O. It was free of pathogenic conforms and had no traces of the toxic metals Pb and Cd. Its Zn content was 103.67 ppm, way below the allowable limit of 1000 ppm. However, the other four composting ventures had poor compost quality with a C:N ratio of over 40 but the composts were also relatively free of pathogenic coliforms and the toxic metals Pb and Cd. Financial analysis showed that the direct costs of producing compost ranged from PhP1,515-PhP13,654 per ton, which were greater than the income or value from the compost produced. Thiscould be due to the relatively low price of the product because of its poor quality. Composting entailed a financial gap that ranged from PhP 551-PhP10,946 per ton, which must be bridged from other sources, if not subsidized by the local government. However, if indirect benefits such as the value of savings from avoided landfill and collection costs are considered, the composting activities are economically or socially beneficial due to positive economic gains.
机译:研究了菲律宾马尼拉大都会的五种城市生物垃圾堆肥企业的堆肥质量和经济可行性。被选择为代表从市场,家庭和学校收集的可生物降解废物堆肥的研究地点包括:a)帕西格市集市场; b)奎松市的Barangay(Bgy)圣灵; c)Bgy。玛丽基纳市康塞普西翁乌诺; d)Bgy。卡卢坎市169号; e)Muntinlupa市ParefWoodrose School,Inc.。 Bgy 169的堆肥通过了肥料和农药管理局(FPA)的堆肥或土壤改良剂标准。化学分析表明,该堆肥的C:N比为21,有机物含量为39%,总氮为1.08%,P_2O_5为0.81%P,K_2O为1.58%K。它不含致病菌,没有任何有毒金属Pb和Cd的痕迹。锌含量为103.67 ppm,远低于允许的1000 ppm限值。但是,其他四个堆肥企业的堆肥质量较差,C:N比超过40,但堆肥也相对不含致病性大肠菌和有毒金属Pb和Cd。财务分析表明,生产堆肥的直接成本在每吨1,515-13,654菲律宾比索之间,大于所生产堆肥的收入或价值。这可能是由于产品质量差而价格相对较低。堆肥造成的资金缺口在每吨551至10,946菲律宾比索之间,如果没有当地政府的补贴,则必须从其他来源中弥补。但是,如果考虑间接收益,例如避免垃圾填埋和收集成本所节省的价值,则堆肥活动将因积极的经济收益而在经济或社会上受益。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号