In your leading article "Homoeopathy hubbub"(PJ,3 September,p272),as a token of your belief that "journalists,like scientists,should have open minds",you state: "There may be no convincing proof that homoeopathy works,but equally there is no convincing proof that it does not work." That,surely,is to take open-mindedness to an unscientific level.The burden of proof must be with the proponents of homoeopathy,to present evidence of the truth of their contentions.This they singularly fail to do.
展开▼
