首页> 外文期刊>The pharmaceutical journal >PJ should be free from'dead hand'of Lambeth
【24h】

PJ should be free from'dead hand'of Lambeth

机译:PJ应该摆脱Lambeth的“死手”

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Your pages are full of change and reform.The one great reform I would like to see is the freeing of The Pharmaceutical Journal from its official link with the Royal Pharmaceutical Society.At the present,the only good thing to come out of Lambeth is the PJ.It is essential reading,absolutely crammed with the information we need to practise pharmacy.The one glaring exception is in the reporting of the doings of the Council and officers of the Society.In this instance,we readers,members of the Society for the most part,are in much the same position as the old Kremlin watchers in pre-glasnost Russia.
机译:您的页面充满了变化和改革。我想看到的一项重大改革是将《 The Pharmaceutical Journal》从其与皇家药学会的官方链接中解放出来。目前,Lambeth唯一能带来的好处是PJ。这是一本必不可少的书,绝对挤满了我们从事药学工作所需的信息。一个明显的例外是对理事会和学会会员的工作情况的报告。在这种情况下,我们的读者,学会会员大多数情况下,他们与格拉斯诺斯特前俄罗斯的克里姆林宫守望者处于几乎相同的位置。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号