...
首页> 外文期刊>The Pediatric infectious disease journal >Azithromycin compared with beta-lactam antibiotic treatment failures in pneumococcal infections of children.
【24h】

Azithromycin compared with beta-lactam antibiotic treatment failures in pneumococcal infections of children.

机译:阿奇霉素与β-内酰胺类抗生素治疗儿童肺炎球菌感染失败的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether treatment failures occurred more commonly with azithromycin than with beta-lactam antibiotics in children who developed invasive pneumococcal disease within 30 days of receiving prior antimicrobial therapy. METHODS: Retrospective review of medical records of children evaluated at Texas Children's Hospital between 1996 and 2002 who had received antimicrobials (azithromycin or a beta-lactam antibiotic) and developed invasive pneumococcal disease within 30 days. Treatment failure was defined as invasive pneumococcal infection that occurred while taking antimicrobials or within 3 days of stopping azithromycin treatment or 1 day of stopping beta-lactam treatment. Penicillin and azithromycin susceptibilities were determined and categorized according to National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards guidelines. RESULTS: We identified 21 and 33 children with similar demographic features who had developed invasive pneumococcal disease within 1 month of receiving azithromycin or a beta-lactam antibiotic, respectively. Eleven (52%) children in the azithromycin group and 11 (33%) in the beta-lactam group met the definition for treatment failures (P = 0.34). Eight treatment failures while receiving azithromycin were caused by pneumococci with the macrolide-resistant (M) phenotype, 2 with the macrolide-, lincosamide- and streptogramin B-resistant (MLSB) phenotype and 1 by a macrolide-susceptible organism. In the beta-lactam group 7 had a penicillin-resistant isolate, 3 had an intermediately susceptible isolate and 1 had a susceptible isolate. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that treatment failures among patients who developed invasive disease within 30 days of receiving an antimicrobial occur as frequently in patients who receive beta-lactam antibiotics as in those who receive azithromycin. Furthermore macrolide resistant organisms are not more likely to be recovered after a macrolide treatment failure than a penicillin-nonsusceptible isolate being recovered after a beta-lactam treatment failure (P = 1.0).
机译:目的:确定在接受抗菌药物治疗后30天内发生侵袭性肺炎球菌疾病的儿童中,阿奇霉素治疗的失败是否比β-内酰胺类抗生素更常见。方法:回顾性研究1996年至2002年间在德克萨斯儿童医院评估的接受抗菌药物(阿奇霉素或β-内酰胺类抗生素)并在30天内发生侵袭性肺炎球菌疾病的儿童的病历。治疗失败的定义为在服用抗菌药物时或在停止阿奇霉素治疗的3天内或在停止β-内酰胺治疗的1天内发生的侵袭性肺炎球菌感染。根据国家临床实验室标准委员会指南确定并分类了青霉素和阿奇霉素的敏感性。结果:我们确定了21名和33名具有相似人口统计学特征的儿童,分别在接受阿奇霉素或β-内酰胺类抗生素治疗1个月内出现了侵袭性肺炎球菌疾病。阿奇霉素组的11名儿童(52%)和β-内酰胺组的11名儿童(33%)符合治疗失败的定义(P = 0.34)。接受阿奇霉素治疗的八项治疗失败是由耐大环内酯(M)型的肺炎球菌,耐大环内酯,林可酰胺和链霉菌素B型(MLSB)的肺炎球菌引起的,而对大环内酯敏感的有机物引起了1例治疗失败。在β-内酰胺组中,有7种具有耐青霉素的分离物,有3种具有中等敏感性的分离物,有1种具有敏感的分离物。结论:我们的研究表明,在接受抗微生物剂治疗后30天内发生浸润性疾病的患者中,治疗失败的发生率与接受阿奇霉素的患者一样,频繁发生于接受β-内酰胺类抗生素的患者。此外,与大环内酯类药物抗药性相比,在接受大环内酯类药物治疗后失败的可能性不如在β-内酰胺治疗失败后被恢复的青霉素非敏感性分离株高(P = 1.0)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号