...
首页> 外文期刊>The spine journal: official journal of the North American Spine Society >Tapping insertional torque allows prediction for better pedicle screw fixation and optimal screw size selection
【24h】

Tapping insertional torque allows prediction for better pedicle screw fixation and optimal screw size selection

机译:轻敲插入扭矩可以预测更好的椎弓根螺钉固定和最佳的螺钉尺寸选择

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background context: There is currently no reliable technique for intraoperative assessment of pedicle screw fixation strength and optimal screw size. Several studies have evaluated pedicle screw insertional torque (IT) and its direct correlation with pullout strength. However, there is limited clinical application with pedicle screw IT as it must be measured during screw placement and rarely causes the spine surgeon to change screw size. To date, no study has evaluated tapping IT, which precedes screw insertion, and its ability to predict pedicle screw pullout strength. Purpose: The objective of this study was to investigate tapping IT and its ability to predict pedicle screw pullout strength and optimal screw size. Study design: In vitro human cadaveric biomechanical analysis. Methods: Twenty fresh-frozen human cadaveric thoracic vertebral levels were prepared and dual-energy radiographic absorptiometry scanned for bone mineral density (BMD). All specimens were osteoporotic with a mean BMD of 0.60±0.07 g/cm2. Five specimens (n=10) were used to perform a pilot study, as there were no previously established values for optimal tapping IT. Each pedicle during the pilot study was measured using a digital caliper as well as computed tomography measurements, and the optimal screw size was determined to be equal to or the first size smaller than the pedicle diameter. The optimal tap size was then selected as the tap diameter 1 mm smaller than the optimal screw size. During optimal tap size insertion, all peak tapping IT values were found to be between 2 in-lbs and 3 in-lbs. Therefore, the threshold tapping IT value for optimal pedicle screw and tap size was determined to be 2.5 in-lbs, and a comparison tapping IT value of 1.5 in-lbs was selected. Next, 15 test specimens (n=30) were measured with digital calipers, probed, tapped, and instrumented using a paired comparison between the two threshold tapping IT values (Group 1: 1.5 in-lbs; Group 2: 2.5 in-lbs), randomly assigned to the left or right pedicle on each specimen. Each pedicle was incrementally tapped to increasing size (3.75, 4.00, 4.50, and 5.50 mm) until the threshold value was reached based on the assigned group. Pedicle screw size was determined by adding 1 mm to the tap size that crossed the threshold torque value. Torque measurements were recorded with each revolution during tap and pedicle screw insertion. Each specimen was then individually potted and pedicle screws pulled out "in-line" with the screw axis at a rate of 0.25 mm/sec. Peak pullout strength (POS) was measured in Newtons (N). Results: The peak tapping IT was significantly increased (50%) in Group 2 (3.23±0.65 in-lbs) compared with Group 1 (2.15±0.56 in-lbs) (p=.0005). The peak screw IT was also significantly increased (19%) in Group 2 (8.99±2.27 in-lbs) compared with Group 1 (7.52±2.96 in-lbs) (p=.02). The pedicle screw pullout strength was also significantly increased (23%) in Group 2 (877.9±235.2 N) compared with Group 1 (712.3±223.1 N) (p=.017). The mean pedicle screw diameter was significantly increased in Group 2 (5.70±1.05 mm) compared with Group 1 (5.00±0.80 mm) (p=.0002). There was also an increased rate of optimal pedicle screw size selection in Group 2 with 9 of 15 (60%) pedicle screws compared with Group 1 with 4 of 15 (26.7%) pedicle screws within 1 mm of the measured pedicle width. There was a moderate correlation for tapping IT with both screw IT (r=0.54; p=.002) and pedicle screw POS (r=0.55; p=.002). Conclusions: Our findings suggest that tapping IT directly correlates with pedicle screw IT, pedicle screw pullout strength, and optimal pedicle screw size. Therefore, tapping IT may be used during thoracic pedicle screw instrumentation as an adjunct to preoperative imaging and clinical experience to maximize fixation strength and optimize pedicle "fit and fill" with the largest screw possible. However, further prospective, in vivo studies are necessary to evaluate the intraoperative use of
机译:背景技术:目前尚无可靠的术中评估椎弓根螺钉固定强度和最佳螺钉尺寸的技术。几项研究评估了椎弓根螺钉的插入扭矩(IT)及其与拔出强度的直接关系。但是,椎弓根螺钉IT的临床应用有限,因为必须在螺钉放置期间对其进行测量,并且极少引起脊柱外科医生改变螺钉大小。迄今为止,尚无研究评估在螺钉插入之前的攻牙IT及其预测椎弓根螺钉拔出强度的能力。目的:本研究的目的是研究攻丝技术及其预测椎弓根螺钉拉出强度和最佳螺钉尺寸的能力。研究设计:体外人体尸体生物力学分析。方法:准备20只新鲜冷冻的人尸体胸椎椎骨,并用双能X线骨密度仪进行骨密度测定。所有标本均为骨质疏松,平均骨密度为0.60±0.07 g / cm2。由于以前没有确定最佳攻丝IT的值,因此使用了五个标本(n = 10)进行了初步研究。使用数字卡尺和计算机X射线断层扫描测量仪对试验研究中的每个椎弓根进行测量,确定最佳螺钉尺寸等于或小于椎弓根直径的第一尺寸。然后选择最佳丝锥尺寸,因为丝锥直径比最佳螺丝尺寸小1 mm。在最佳的丝锥尺寸插入过程中,发现所有的丝锥IT峰值均在2 in-lbs和3 in-lbs之间。因此,确定最佳椎弓根螺钉和丝锥尺寸的攻丝IT阈值为2.5 in-lbs,并选择1.5 in-lbs的对比攻丝IT值。接下来,使用数字卡尺测量15个试样(n = 30),使用两个阈值攻丝IT值之间的配对比较进行探测,敲击和检测(组1:1.5 in-lbs;组2:2.5 in-lbs) ,随机分配给每个标本的左蒂或右蒂。将每个椎弓根逐渐轻敲以增大尺寸(3.75、4.00、4.50和5.50 mm),直到达到基于所分配组的阈值为止。椎弓根螺钉尺寸的确定是通过将​​超出阈值扭矩值的丝锥尺寸增加1 mm。在自攻和椎弓根螺钉插入过程中,每转一圈记录扭矩测量值。然后将每个标本单独灌封,并以0.25毫米/秒的速度与螺钉轴线“成一直线”拔出椎弓根螺钉。峰值拉出强度(POS)以牛顿(N)为单位。结果:与组1(2.15±0.56 in-lbs)相比,组2(3.23±0.65 in-lbs)的峰值攻丝IT显着增加(50%)(p = .0005)。与第1组(7.52±2.96 in-lbs)相比,第2组(8.99±2.27 in-lbs)的峰值螺钉IT也显着增加(19%)(p = .02)。与第1组(712.3±223.1 N)相比,第2组(877.9±235.2 N)的椎弓根螺钉拉出强度也显着提高(23%)(p = .017)。与组1(5.00±0.80 mm)相比,组2(5.70±1.05 mm)的平均椎弓根螺钉直径明显增加(p = .0002)。与第1组相比,在测量的椎弓根宽度1毫米内,第15组有15个椎弓根螺钉中的4根(26.7%),与第1组相比,第2组中的9个椎弓根螺钉的最佳选择率增加了。用螺钉IT(r = 0.54; p = .002)和椎弓根螺钉POS(r = 0.55; p = .002)进行IT攻牙的相关性中等。结论:我们的研究结果表明,攻牙IT与椎弓根螺钉IT,椎弓根螺钉拔出强度和最佳椎弓根螺钉尺寸直接相关。因此,在胸椎椎弓根螺钉器械期间可以使用自攻IT技术作为术前影像学和临床经验的辅助手段,以最大程度地固定固定强度,并通过最大的螺钉来优化椎弓根的“安装和填充”。但是,需要进一步的前瞻性体内研究来评估术中使用

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号