首页> 外文期刊>The Southeast Asian journal of tropical medicine and public health >COMPARISON OF MEDICAL COSTS AND CARE OF APPENDECTOMY PATIENTS BETWEEN FEE-FOR-SERVICE AND SET FEE FOR DIAGNOSIS-RELATED GROUP SYSTEMS IN 20 CHINESE HOSPITALS
【24h】

COMPARISON OF MEDICAL COSTS AND CARE OF APPENDECTOMY PATIENTS BETWEEN FEE-FOR-SERVICE AND SET FEE FOR DIAGNOSIS-RELATED GROUP SYSTEMS IN 20 CHINESE HOSPITALS

机译:20所中国医院诊断相关小组系统的服务费和固定费用的医疗费用和阑尾病人的护理比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The objective of this study was to compare the fee-for-service and set fee for diagnosis-related group systems with regard to quality of medical care and cost to appendectomy patients. We conducted a retrospective study of 208 inpatients (from 20 hospitals) who undergone appendectomy in Changsha, China during 2013. Data were obtained from databases of medical insurance information systems directly connected to the hospital information systems. We collected and compared patient ages, length of study, and total medical costs for impatient appendectomies between patients using fee-for-service and set fee for diagnosis related group systems. One hundred thirty-three patients used the fee for service system and 75 used the set fee diagnosis related group system. For those using the diagnosis-related group system, the mean length of hospitalization (6.2 days) and mean number of prescribed antimicrobials (2.4) per patient were significantly lower than those of the patients who used the fee-for-service system (7.3 days and 3.0, respectively; p = 0.018; p < 0.05) and were accompanied by lower medical costs and cost of antimicrobials (RMB 2,518 versus RMB 4,484 and RMB476 versus RMB1,108, respectively; p = 0.000, p = 0.000). There were no significant differences in post-surgical complications between the two systems. The diagnosis-related group system had significantly medical costs for appendectomy compared to the fee-for-service system, without sacrificing quality of medical care.
机译:这项研究的目的是就医疗质量和阑尾切除术患者的费用比较诊断相关组系统的服务费和固定费用。我们对2013年在中国长沙进行了阑尾切除术的208名住院患者(来自20所医院)进行了回顾性研究。数据来自与医院信息系统直接相连的医疗保险信息系统的数据库。我们收集并比较了患者的年龄,研究时间以及患者之间使用不付费使用的阑尾切除术的总医疗费用,并使用了与诊断相关的小组系统的费用。一百三十三名患者使用了收费服务系统,而七十五名患者使用了收费诊断相关小组系统。对于使用诊断相关组系统的患者,每位患者的平均住院时间(6.2天)和平均处方抗菌药物的数量(2.4)显着低于使用付费服务系统的患者(7.3天)和3.0,分别为p = 0.018,p <0.05)和较低的医疗费用和抗菌剂费用(分别为2,518元人民币对4,484元人民币和476元人民币对1,108元人民币; p = 0.000,p = 0.000)。两种系统之间的术后并发症没有显着差异。与诊断相关的小组系统与按服务付费系统相比,阑尾切除术的医疗费用显着增加,而又不牺牲医疗质量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号