...
首页> 外文期刊>The Scandinavian Journal of Economics >Discrimination in Scientific Review: A Natural Field Experiment on Blind versus Non-Blind Reviews*
【24h】

Discrimination in Scientific Review: A Natural Field Experiment on Blind versus Non-Blind Reviews*

机译:科学评论中的歧视:盲人和非盲人评论的自然实验*

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Using papers submitted to an international conference on economics held in Sweden in 2008, we analyze how gender, as well as other characteristics of the authors and reviewers, affects the grading of these papers by the reviewers. Correcting for othervariables, including the country and research field, as well as the academic level of the author, we focus on the difference in grades between blind and non-blind review treatments. We find that non-blind reviewing has little effect, and there is no significant evidence of gender discrimination. Furthermore, we do not find any significant difference between the average grading by female and male reviewers.
机译:我们使用提交给2008年瑞典国际经济学会议的论文,分析了性别以及作者和审稿人的其他特征如何影响审稿人对这些论文的评分。在校正其他变量(包括国家和研究领域以及作者的学术水平)后,我们重点研究了盲法和非盲法复习方法之间的等级差异。我们发现,非盲目审查的影响很小,也没有明显的性别歧视证据。此外,我们没有发现男性和女性评论者的平均评分之间存在显着差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号