首页> 外文OA文献 >Discrimination in Scientific Review - A natural field experiment on blind versus non-blind review
【2h】

Discrimination in Scientific Review - A natural field experiment on blind versus non-blind review

机译:科学评论中的歧视 - 盲目与非盲审的自然田间试验

摘要

This paper analyzes the impacts of gender, as well as other author characteristics, on reviewers’ grading of papers submitted to an international conference in economics in Sweden in 2008. Correcting for other variables, including country and research field as well as researcher academic level, we focus on the difference in grades between blind and non-blind review treatments. We find little effect of non-blind reviewing and no significant evidence of gender or any other type of discrimination. Furthermore, we do not find any significant difference between the average grading by female and male reviewers.
机译:本文分析了性别以及其他作者特征对审阅者在2008年瑞典国际经济学会议上提交论文的评分的影响。校正了其他变量,包括国家和研究领域以及研究者的学术水平,我们专注于盲法和非盲法复习治疗的等级差异。我们发现非盲目审查的影响很小,也没有明显的性别或任何其他类型歧视的证据。此外,我们发现女性和男性评论者的平均评分之间没有显着差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号