...
首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of family practice >Family physicians' referral decisions: results from the ASPN referral study.
【24h】

Family physicians' referral decisions: results from the ASPN referral study.

机译:家庭医生的转诊决定:ASPN转诊研究的结果。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To examine family physicians' referral decisions, which we conceptualized as having 2 phases: whether to refer followed by to whom to refer. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. POPULATION: All visits (N = 34,519) and new referrals (N = 2534) occurring during 15 consecutive business days in the offices of 141 family physicians in 87 practices located in 31 states. OUTCOMES MEASURED: Rates of referral, reasons for referral, practitioners referred to, health problems prompting referral, and reasons for selecting particular specialists. RESULTS: Approximately 1 in 20 (5.1%) office visits led to referral. Although 68% of referrals were made by physicians during office visits, 18% were made by physicians during telephone conversations with patients, 11% by office staff with input from the physician, and 3% by staff without physician input. Physicians endorsed a mean of 1.8 reasons for making a referral. They sought specialists' advice on either diagnosis or treatment for 52.1% of referrals and asked the specialist to direct medical management for 25.9% and surgical management for 37.8%. Patient request was one reason for 13.6% of referrals. Fifty conditions accounted for 76% of all referrals. Surgical specialists were sent the largest share of referrals (45.4%), followed by medical specialists (31.0%), nonphysician clinicians (12.1%), obstetrician-gynecologists (4.6%), mental health professionals (4.2%), other practitioners (2.0%), and generalists (0.8%). Physicians recommended a specific practitioner to the patient for most (86.2%) referrals. Personal knowledge of the specialist was the most important reason for selecting a specific specialist. CONCLUSIONS: Referrals are commonly made during encounters other than office visits, such as telephone conversations or staff-patient interactions, in primary care practice. Training in the referral process should ensure that family physicians obtain the skills necessary to expand their scope of practice, when appropriate; determine when and why a patient should be referred; and identify the type of practitioner to whom the patient should be sent.
机译:目的:检查家庭医生的转诊决定,我们将其概念化为两个阶段:是否转诊,然后再转介给谁。研究设计:前瞻性队列研究。人口:在31个州的87家诊所的141位家庭医生的办公室中,连续15个工作日内进行的所有访问(N = 34,519)和新的转诊(N = 2534)。评估的结果:转诊率,转诊原因,转诊医生,促使转诊的健康问题以及选择特定专家的原因。结果:约有20分之1(5.1%)的办公室拜访导致了转诊。尽管68%的转诊是由医生在办公室就诊期间进行的,但18%的是由医生在与患者的电话交谈中进行的,11%是由办公室工作人员在有医生的投入下进行的,3%是由没有医生输入的人员进行的。医师认可推荐的平均理由为1.8。他们就转诊的52.1%寻求专家的诊断或治疗建议,并要求专家指导25.9%的内科治疗和37.8%的外科治疗。患者要求是转诊13.6%的原因之一。五十个条件占所有推荐的76%。外科专科医生转诊的比例最大(45.4%),其次是医学专科医生(31.0%),非内科临床医师(12.1%),妇产科(4.6%),精神卫生专业人员(4.2%),其他从业人员(2.0) %)和通才(0.8%)。医生推荐给大多数(86.2%)转诊患者的专科医生。专家的个人知识是选择特定专家的最重要原因。结论:在基层医疗实践中,转诊通常是在办公室访问以外的其他相遇期间进行的,例如电话交谈或医患互动。转诊过程中的培训应确保家庭医生在适当时获得扩大其业务范围所必需的技能;确定何时以及为什么应该转诊患者;并确定应将患者送往的执业医师类型。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号