...
首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of extra-corporeal technology >Comparison of five point-of-care prothrombin and activated partial thromboplastin time devices based on age of blood sample.
【24h】

Comparison of five point-of-care prothrombin and activated partial thromboplastin time devices based on age of blood sample.

机译:根据血样的年龄比较五个即时护理凝血酶原和活化的部分凝血活酶时间装置。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Delays in processing statium (STAT) blood samples have led to the production of an increasing number of point-of-care tests. Product inserts recommend measuring blood samples immediately after procurement, suggesting that delays may invalidate the test results. We studied the effect of the age of blood samples on point-of-care (POC) prothrombin time (PT) and an activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) result. Informed consent was obtained from 11 patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). Blood samples (40 mL) were taken from each patient. Each blood sample was used to perform five PT tests and six aPTT tests on five POC devices (Gem PCL, Hemochron 801, Hemochron Jr. Signature, Hemochron Response, Rapidpoint Coag) at three different sample ages [< 60 s (fresh blood), 10 and 18 min after sample collection]. Blood samples were procured in a plastic syringe devoid of air bubbles, which was left undisturbed between tests but was gently agitated before initiating the 10- and 18-min tests. For tests requiring citrated whole blood, a fraction of each sample was anticoagulated (3.8% citrate) at each age. Statistical analysis was used for comparison of test results for fresh blood to aged samples (10 and 18 min). Test values were recorded as International Normalized Ratio (INR) and seconds for PT and aPTT, respectively. Two devices, the Hemochron 801 and Hemochron response showed statistically, although not clinically, significant variation in PT test results when the samples were aged to 10 and 18 minutes. As for aPTT results, Hemochron 801, Hemochron response, Hemochron Jr. signature, and Gem PCL showed statistically significant variation at 18 minutes. One device (Hemochron 801) reported results with 10-min aged blood that were statistically different from fresh blood. None of the aPTT tests results from any device produced results with aged blood that were clinically different from fresh blood. This study suggests that, in the tests evaluated, blood samples that have aged 10 or 18 min will produce clinically relevant aPTT and PT results, respectively.
机译:延缓处理静态(STAT)血液样本已导致产生越来越多的即时检验。产品插页建议在采购后立即测量血液样本,这表明延迟可能会使测试结果无效。我们研究了血样年龄对即时护理(POC)凝血酶原时间(PT)和活化的凝血活酶部分时间(aPTT)结果的影响。知情同意书来自11例行体外循环(CPB)的患者。从每位患者中采集血样(40 mL)。在三个不同的样本年龄[<60 s(新鲜血液),样品收集后10和18分钟]。在没有气泡的塑料注射器中采集血样,在两次测试之间将其保持原样,但在开始10分钟和18分钟测试之前将其轻轻搅动。对于需要柠檬酸化全血的测试,每个年龄段的每个样品都进行抗凝(3.8%柠檬酸)。统计分析用于比较新鲜血液与老化样品的测试结果(10和18分钟)。测试值分别记录为PT和aPTT的国际标准化比率(INR)和秒数。当样品分别老化至10分钟和18分钟时,Hemochron 801和Hemochron响应这两种设备在统计学上(尽管在临床上并不如此)显示出PT测试结果的显着差异。至于aPTT结果,Hemochron 801,Hemochron响应,Hemochron Jr.签名和Gem PCL在18分钟时显示出统计学上的显着差异。一种设备(Hemochron 801)报告了10分钟老化血液的结果,该结果在统计学上与新鲜血液不同。没有任何aPTT测试结果来自任何在临床上不同于新鲜血液的老化血液中产生的结果。这项研究表明,在评估的测试中,年龄为10或18分钟的血液样本将分别产生与临床相关的aPTT和PT结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号