...
首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Experimental Biology >What counts for ants? How return behaviour and food search of Cataglyphis ants are modified by variations in food quantity and experience
【24h】

What counts for ants? How return behaviour and food search of Cataglyphis ants are modified by variations in food quantity and experience

机译:蚂蚁算什么?如何通过改变食物数量和经验来改变甲虫的返回行为和寻找食物

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

When finding more food than one is able to carry home, should one come back to the site to exploit it further This question is crucial for central place foragers that provide for a home place with brood or nest mates. The benefit of returning has to be weighed against the chance of finding food elsewhere and the resources available. Desert ants Cataglyphis fortis are well-studied examples when it comes to navigating back and forth between their nest and a foraging area, due to their primary reliance on path integration in the open and featureless desert habitat. The ants use path integration not only for a safe return from their foraging trips but also for future returns to plentiful feeding sites. The direction from the nest that has previously yielded food items is preferred for future foraging trips, a phenomenon termed sector fidelity. What prompts the ants to return to a particular site, and how faithfully they search for that place, has not been well studied. We examine the evaluation of food sources in channel experiments by varying both the number of food items in a feeder and the number of visits to the feeder before testing search distances of foragers returning to the feeding site. Ants exhibited more focused searches for plentiful food sources than for sources with only few food items upon their first return visit. After several successful visits, the ants always searched thoroughly for the food source, independent of the amount of food offered. Thus, desert ants consider both food abundance and reliability of food encounter, with corroborative learning of reliability gradually overriding the initial preference for plentiful feeders. The density of food items appears to be used by the ants as a proxy for food abundance. On the level of our analysis, the searches performed in the experimental channels are indistinguishable from those performed in the open desert terrain. The present results not only demonstrate how otherwise well-studied desert ants assess yield and experience with reliability of food sources, but also establish a model system for future study of how itemised food sources are exploited.
机译:当发现食物不能带回家时,应该回到现场进一步开发该问题。这个问题对于为有家禽或巢伙伴提供居所的中央地方觅食者至关重要。必须权衡返回收益与在其他地方找到食物的机会和可用资源之间的权衡。沙漠蚂蚁Cataglyphis fortis是在巢穴和觅食区之间来回导航时经过充分研究的例子,这是因为它们主要依赖于开放且无特征的沙漠栖息地中的路径整合。蚂蚁不仅使用路径整合技术来确保觅食之旅的安全返回,而且还可以将其返回到大量的觅食地点。从巢中先产生食物的方向是将来觅食旅行的首选,这种现象被称为部门保真度。促使蚂蚁返回特定地点的原因以及他们如何忠实地寻找该地点,尚未得到很好的研究。我们通过测试喂食器返回觅食地点的搜索距离之前,通过改变喂食器中食物的数量和访问喂食器的次数,来检查渠道实验中对食物来源的评估。与首次回访时只有很少食物的食物来源相比,蚂蚁对食物来源的搜寻更加集中。在几次成功的拜访之后,蚂蚁总是彻底地寻找食物来源,而与所提供的食物数量无关。因此,沙漠蚂蚁同时考虑食物的丰度和食物接触的可靠性,而可靠的可靠学习逐渐取代了最初对大量饲养者的偏好。食物的密度似乎被蚂蚁用来代替食物的丰度。从我们的分析水平来看,在实验渠道中进行的搜索与在旷野中进行的搜索没有区别。目前的结果不仅证明了经过精心研究的沙漠蚂蚁如何评估食物来源的可靠性和产量,而且还建立了一个模型系统,用于未来研究如何利用逐项食物来源。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号