首页> 外文期刊>The quarterly journal of experimental psychology: QJEP >Effects of stimulus order on discrimination processes in comparative and equality judgements: Data and models
【24h】

Effects of stimulus order on discrimination processes in comparative and equality judgements: Data and models

机译:刺激顺序对比较和平等判断中歧视过程的影响:数据和模型

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In typical discrimination experiments, participants are presented with a constant standard and a variable comparison stimulus and their task is to judge which of these two stimuli is larger (comparative judgement). In these experiments, discrimination sensitivity depends on the temporal order of these stimuli (Type B effect) and is usually higher when the standard precedes rather than follows the comparison. Here, we outline how two models of stimulus discrimination can account for the Type B effect, namely the weighted difference model (or basic Sensation Weighting model) and the Internal Reference Model. For both models, the predicted psychometric functions for comparative judgements as well as for equality judgements, in which participants indicate whether they perceived the two stimuli to be equal or not equal, are derived and it is shown that the models also predict a Type B effect for equality judgements. In the empirical part, the models' predictions are evaluated. To this end, participants performed a duration discrimination task with comparative judgements and with equality judgements. In line with the models' predictions, a Type B effect was observed for both judgement types. In addition, a time-order error, as indicated by shifts of the psychometric functions, and differences in response times were observed only for the equality judgement. Since both models entail distinct additional predictions, it seems worthwhile for future research to unite the two models into one conceptual framework.
机译:在典型的辨别实验中,为参与者提供恒定的标准和可变的比较刺激,他们的任务是判断这两个刺激中哪个刺激较大(比较判断)。在这些实验中,判别灵敏度取决于这些刺激的时间顺序(B型效应),并且当标准在比较之前而不是在比较之后通常更高。在这里,我们概述了两种刺激歧视模型如何解释B型效应,即加权差异模型(或基本感觉加权模型)和内部参考模型。对于这两种模型,都推导了比较判断和平等判断的预期心理测度函数,其中参与者指示他们是否认为两个刺激相等或不相等,并且表明模型还预测了B型效应平等审判。在经验部分,评估模型的预测。为此,参与者通过比较判断和平等判断来执行持续时间歧视任务。与模型的预测一致,两种判断类型均观察到B型效应。另外,仅通过相等性判断,观察到了由心理测验函数的移动所指示的时间顺序误差和响应时间的差异。由于这两种模型都需要不同的附加预测,因此将来的研究似乎有必要将这两种模型整合为一个概念框架。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号