首页> 外文期刊>The quarterly journal of experimental psychology: QJEP >Competition between rhythmic and linguistic organization in a sentence-rhythm Stroop task
【24h】

Competition between rhythmic and linguistic organization in a sentence-rhythm Stroop task

机译:句子节奏Stroop任务中节奏组织和语言组织之间的竞争

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

We provide a test of Patel's [(2003). Language, music, syntax and the brain. Nature Neuroscience, 6, 674-681] shared syntactic integration resources hypothesis by investigating the competition between determinants of rhythmic parsing and linguistic parsing using a sentence-rhythm Stroop task. We played five-note rhythm patterns in which each note is replaced with a spoken word of a five-word sentence and asked participants to indicate the starting point of the rhythm while they disregarded which word would normally be heard as the first word of the sentence. In Study 1, listeners completed the task in their native language. In Study 2, we investigated whether this competition is weakened if the sentences were in a listener's non-native language. In Study 3, we investigated how much language mastery is necessary to obtain the effects seen in Studies 1 and 2. We demonstrate that processing resources for rhythmic parsing and linguistic parsing overlap with one another, particularly when the task is demanding. We also show that the tendency for language to bias processing does not require deep knowledge of the language.
机译:我们提供了Patel [(2003)的测试。语言,音乐,语法和大脑。 Nature Neuroscience,6,674-681]通过使用句子节奏Stroop任务调查节奏解析和语言解析的决定因素之间的竞争,从而共享了句法整合资源假设。我们演奏了五音符节奏模式,其中每个音符都替换成一个五字句子的口语单词,并要求参与者指出节奏的起点,而他们却忽略了通常会听到哪个单词作为句子的第一个单词。在研究1中,听众以其母语完成了任务。在研究2中,我们调查了如果句子是用听众的非母语语言进行的话,这种竞争是否会减弱。在研究3中,我们研究了多少语言精通才能获得研究1和2所示的效果。我们证明,用于节奏分析和语言分析的处理资源彼此重叠,尤其是在任务艰巨时。我们还表明,语言偏向处理的趋势不需要对语言有深入的了解。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号