...
首页> 外文期刊>The American journal of emergency medicine >Regarding 'repeated pulse intramuscular injection of pralidoxime chloride in severe acute organophosphorus pesticide poisoning'
【24h】

Regarding 'repeated pulse intramuscular injection of pralidoxime chloride in severe acute organophosphorus pesticide poisoning'

机译:关于“重度急性有机磷农药中毒反复脉冲肌内注射氯吡肟肟”

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We read with interest the recent article on the use of pralidoxime in acute organophosphorus (OP)–poisoned patients (AOPP) [1]. Clarification of several issues would greatly assist in our ability to determine whether the results presented are valid and broadly applicable. Although not clearly stated, it seems that this retrospective study was a comparison of protocols from 2 intensive care units (ICUs) that care for AOPP. Therefore, it is unclear whether the treated populations are comparable, which makes interpretation of the results challenging. The treatment protocol used for one group of patients is detailed with regard to pralidoxime and atropine dosing, whereas the other is vague and uncertain. Interestingly, the cumulative atropine dose was evaluated as an end point when atropine, not pralidoxime, is regarded as the cornerstone of AOPP.
机译:我们感兴趣地阅读了有关在急性有机磷(OP)中毒患者(AOPP)中使用普利多肟的最新文章[1]。对几个问题的澄清将大大有助于我们确定所提出的结果是否有效和广泛适用的能力。尽管没有明确说明,但这项回顾性研究似乎是对两个照护AOPP的重症监护病房(ICU)方案的比较。因此,不清楚所治疗的人群是否具有可比性,这使得对结果的解释具有挑战性。针对一组患者的治疗方案就普利多肟和阿托品的剂量进行了详细说明,而另一种方案则模糊且不确定。有趣的是,当阿托品而不是普利多肟被认为是AOPP的基石时,阿托品的累积剂量被作为终点。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号