首页> 外文期刊>The American journal of emergency medicine >Dosing and titration of intravenous opioid analgesics administered to ED patients in acute severe pain
【24h】

Dosing and titration of intravenous opioid analgesics administered to ED patients in acute severe pain

机译:急症严重疼痛的ED患者的静脉阿片类镇痛药的剂量和滴定

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objectives: The objectives were to describe the dose of opioids and incidence of titration for management of acute pain in emergency department patients and, secondarily, to assess the association between change in pain and dose. Methods: Data from control groups of 2 randomized clinical trials were analyzed. Patients 21 to 64 years with acute pain judged to warrant intravenous (IV) opioids were eligible. We calculated the mean weight-based dose of IV opioids, distribution of dose, proportion of patients receiving additional IV opioids, and 95% confidence intervals. We compared these statistics to 3 recommendations: 0.1 mg/kg morphine, 10 mg morphine, and titration to analgesic effect. We used multiple linear regression to assess the association between change in pain measured on a numerical rating scale and dose. Results: There were 281 patients with an initial median pain score of 10 (interquartile range: 8, 10). Mean weight-based dose of IV opioids was 0.08 mg/kg (0.07, 0.08 mg/kg). A total of 268 patients (95.4% [92.2%, 97.5%]) received less than 10 mg IV morphine equivalents; 7 patients (2.5% [1.0%, 5.0%]) received additional opioids. There was a weak association between change in pain in the 15, 30, and 60 minutes after the initial bolus and dose: b = 0.22 (0.07, 0.37), b = 0.17 (0.02, 0.32), and b = 0.12 (-0.03, 0.28), respectively, after adjustment for baseline pain. Conclusion: Analgesic practice did not conform to recommended doses or regimens. There was only a weak association between change of pain and dose in the range of doses given. These findings suggest that oligoanalgesia continues to be a problem despite improvements over the past 20 years.
机译:目的:目的是描述阿片类药物的剂量和滴定的发生率,以管理急诊科患者的急性疼痛,其次,评估疼痛变化与剂量之间的关联。方法:分析来自2个随机临床试验对照组的数据。有21至64岁急性疼痛的患者被判定需要接受静脉(IV)阿片类药物治疗。我们计算了静脉内阿片类药物的平均基于体重的剂量,剂量分布,接受其他静脉内阿片类药物的患者比例以及95%的置信区间。我们将这些统计数据与3条建议进行了比较:0.1 mg / kg吗啡,10 mg吗啡和滴定镇痛作用。我们使用多元线性回归来评估在数字评分量表上测得的疼痛变化与剂量之间的关联。结果:281例患者的初始中位疼痛评分为10(四分位数范围:8、10)。静脉内阿片类药物的基于重量的平均剂量为0.08 mg / kg(0.07,0.08 mg / kg)。共有268例患者(95.4%[92.2%,97.5%])接受了小于10毫克的吗啡当量等效治疗; 7名患者(2.5%[1.0%,5.0%])接受了其他阿片类药物。初次推注后15分钟,30分钟和60分钟内疼痛变化与剂量之间存在弱关联:b = 0.22(0.07,0.37),b = 0.17(0.02,0.32),b = 0.12(-0.03) (0.28)分别调整基线疼痛后。结论:镇痛方法与推荐剂量或方案不符。在给定的剂量范围内,疼痛的变化与剂量之间只有很弱的联系。这些发现表明,尽管过去20年来有所改善,但仍然存在寡痛觉过敏的问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号