...
首页> 外文期刊>The American journal of emergency medicine >Cardiac risk factors and risk scores vs cardiac computed tomography angiography: A prospective cohort study for triage of ED patients with acute chest pain
【24h】

Cardiac risk factors and risk scores vs cardiac computed tomography angiography: A prospective cohort study for triage of ED patients with acute chest pain

机译:心脏危险因素和危险评分与心脏计算机断层扫描血管造影的比较:前瞻性队列研究对急性胸痛的ED患者进行分流

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Objective The objective of the study is to evaluate cardiac risk factors and risk scores for prediction of coronary artery disease (CAD) and adverse outcomes in an emergency department (ED) population judged to be at low to intermediate risk for acute coronary syndrome. Methods Informed consent was obtained from consecutive ED patients who presented with chest pain and were evaluated with coronary computed tomography angiography (cCTA). Cardiac risk factors, clinical presentation, electrocardiogram, and laboratory studies were recorded; the Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) and Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) scores were tabulated. Coronary computed tomography angiography findings were rated on a 6-level plaque burden scale and classified for significant CAD (stenosis ≥ 50%). Adverse cardiovascular outcomes were recorded at 30 days. Results Among 250 patients evaluated by cCTA, 143 (57%) had no CAD, 64 (26%) demonstrated minimal plaque (< 30% stenosis), 26 (10%) demonstrated mild plaque (< 50% stenosis), 9 (4%) demonstrated moderate single vessel disease (50%-70% stenosis), 2 (1%) demonstrated moderate multivessel disease, and 6 (2%) demonstrated severe disease (> 70% stenosis). Six patients developed adverse cardiovascular outcomes. Among traditional cardiac risk factors, only age (older) and sex (male) were significant independent predictors of CAD. Correlation with CAD was poor for the TIMI (r = 0.12) and GRACE (r = 0.09-0.23) scores. The TIMI and GRACE scores were not useful to predict adverse outcomes. Coronary computed tomography angiography identified severe CAD in all subjects with adverse outcomes. Conclusion Among ED patients who present with chest pain judged to be at low to intermediate risk for acute coronary syndrome, traditional risk factors are not useful to stratify risk for CAD and adverse outcomes. Coronary computed tomography angiography is an excellent predictor of CAD and outcome.
机译:目的本研究的目的是评估心脏危险因素和危险评分,以预测被判定为急性冠状动脉综合征的中低风险的急诊科(ED)人群的冠状动脉疾病(CAD)和不良后果。方法从表现出胸痛的连续ED患者获得知情同意,并通过冠状动脉计算机断层血管造影(cCTA)进行评估。记录心脏危险因素,临床表现,心电图和实验室检查;将心肌梗塞溶栓(TIMI)和急性冠脉事件全球登记表(GRACE)得分制成表格。冠状动脉计算机断层扫描血管造影结果以6级斑块负荷量表进行评分,并归类为明显的CAD(狭窄度≥50%)。在第30天记录了不良心血管结果。结果在cCTA评估的250例患者中,有143例(57%)没有CAD,64例(26%)表现出最小斑块(<30%狭窄),26例(10%)表现出轻度斑块(<50%狭窄),9例(4 %)表现为中度单支血管病变(50%-70%狭窄),2(1%)表现为中度多支血管病变,6(2%)表现为严重疾病(> 70%狭窄)。 6名患者出现了不良的心血管预后。在传统的心脏危险因素中,只有年龄(较大)和性别(男性)是CAD的重要独立预测因子。 TIMI(r = 0.12)和GRACE(r = 0.09-0.23)得分与CAD的相关性较差。 TIMI和GRACE分数对预测不良结局没有帮助。冠状动脉计算机断层血管造影术可在所有不良结果的受试者中发现严重的CAD。结论在被判定为急性冠状动脉综合征的中低风险的表现为胸痛的ED患者中,传统的危险因素无助于对CAD和不良结局风险进行分层。冠状动脉计算机断层造影血管造影是CAD和预后的极佳预测指标。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号