...
首页> 外文期刊>The American journal of emergency medicine >Antiemetics in the ED: a randomized controlled trial comparing 3 common agents.
【24h】

Antiemetics in the ED: a randomized controlled trial comparing 3 common agents.

机译:ED中的止吐药:比较3种常见药物的随机对照试验。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

I have read the original article entitled "Antiemetics in the ED: a randomized controlled trial comparing 3 common agents" in the American Journal of Emergency Medicine [Mar 2006;24(2): 177-82]. I would like to clarify the following: Data were expressed as means + SD and analyzed by using 1-way analysis of variance with Dunnett procedure for multiple comparisons with a placebo control group (saline only). In Table 2, the means and SDs of intravenous fluid before randomization for total group (83.5 +- 218.3) for droperidol (115.9 +- 265.2), for metoclopramide (56.0 +-172.2), for prochlorperazine (50.0 +- 143.7), and for saline placebo (113.5 + 269.7) were presented. These results showed that the SDs of 5 groups are greater than their mean values. Furthermore, In Table 3, the SD values of sedation and anxiety variables were also larger than the mean values.
机译:我已阅读《美国急诊医学杂志》 [2006年3月; 24(2):177-82]中标题为“ ED中的止吐药:比较3种常见药物的随机对照试验”的原始文章。我想澄清以下几点:数据表示为均值+ SD,并使用Dunnett程序使用方差单向分析对安慰剂对照组(仅盐水)进行多次比较。在表2中,氟哌利多(115.9 +-265.2),甲氧氯普胺(56.0 + -172.2),丙氯哌嗪(50.0 +-143.7)的总组(83.5 +-218.3),随机分组前的静脉输液平均值和SDs。生理盐水安慰剂(113.5 + 269.7)出现。这些结果表明5组的SD大于其平均值。此外,在表3中,镇静和焦虑变量的SD值也大于平均值。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号