首页> 外文期刊>The American journal of drug and alcohol abuse >Comorbid major depressive disorder as a prognostic factor in cocaine-abusing buprenorphine-maintained patients treated with desipramine and contingency management.
【24h】

Comorbid major depressive disorder as a prognostic factor in cocaine-abusing buprenorphine-maintained patients treated with desipramine and contingency management.

机译:在使用地昔帕明和应变措施治疗的可卡因滥用丁丙诺啡维持患者中,合并性重度抑郁症是预后因素。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Depression is common among patients who abuse both opiates and cocaine, and its treatment has had mixed success. This study compares buprenorphine-maintained patients with lifetime major depressive disorder (MDD, N = 53) with those never depressed (ND, N = 96) on cocaine and opiate-free urines during a 12-week outpatient double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial. The 149 subjects were assigned to four groups: 1) desipramine (DMI) + contingency management (CM); 2) DMI + noncontingency management (NCM); 3) placebo + CM; and 4) placebo + NCM. Depression assessments included Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Inventory, and Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV interview for diagnosis of lifetime MDD. Urine toxicologies were performed thrice weekly and the CES-D was performed monthly. The MDD group had a larger proportion of females (45% vs 21%, P = 0.02) and were more likely to be married (13.2% vs 7.3%, P = 0.02) than the ND group. Treatment retention did not vary by depression status. Hierarchical Linear Modeling found that depressive symptoms decreased comparably across the four treatment groups. Although participation in CM improved drug-free urines more for patients with MDD than for the ND group (Z = 2.44, P = 0.01), treatment with DMI was significantly more efficacious for the ND group than for the MDD group (Z = -2.89, P = 0.003). These results suggest that patients with MDD may respond better to behavioral treatments such as CM than to desipramine plus buprenorphine. The ND cocaine-abusing, opiate-dependent patients may be more responsive to the anticraving effects of DMI.
机译:抑郁症在滥用阿片和可卡因的患者中很常见,其治疗取得了不同的成功。这项研究比较了在为期12周的门诊双盲,安慰剂对照的情况下,丁丙诺啡维持的终生重度抑郁症(MDD,N = 53)与从未抑郁(ND,N = 96)的可卡因和无阿片类药物的患者,随机临床试验。 149名受试者分为四组:1)地昔帕明(DMI)+应急管理(CM); 2)DMI +非应急管理(NCM); 3)安慰剂+ CM;和4)安慰剂+ NCM。抑郁评估包括汉密尔顿抑郁评估量表,流行病学研究中心抑郁量表和用于诊断一生性MDD的DSM-IV访谈的结构化临床访谈。尿毒理学每周进行三次,而CES-D则每月进行一次。与ND组相比,MDD组的女性比例更大(45%比21%,P = 0.02),并且更有可能结婚(13.2%对7.3%,P = 0.02)。治疗保留率并没有因抑郁状态而变化。分层线性建模发现,在四个治疗组中,抑郁症状均较对照下降。尽管参与CM的MDD患者的无药尿比ND组更好(Z = 2.44,P = 0.01),但ND组的DMI治疗比MDD组更有效(Z = -2.89 ,P = 0.003)。这些结果表明,MDD患者对行为疗法(例如CM)的反应可能比地昔帕明加丁丙诺啡的反应更好。滥用ND可卡因的鸦片依赖患者可能对DMI的抗渴作用反应更大。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号