首页> 外文期刊>The American journal of drug and alcohol abuse >Some observations from behavioral economics for consideration in promoting money management among those with substance use disorders
【24h】

Some observations from behavioral economics for consideration in promoting money management among those with substance use disorders

机译:从行为经济学中获得的一些观察结果,可用于在物质使用障碍患者中促进理财的考虑

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: Behavioral economics research has revealed systematic biases in decision making that merit consideration in efforts to promote money management skills among those with substance use disorders (SUDs). Objectives: The objective of this article was to briefly review the literature on five of those biases (i.e., hyperbolic delay discounting, defaults and preference for the status quo, loss aversion, mental accounting, and failure to account for opportunity cost) that may have particular relevance to the topic of money management. Methods: Selected studies are reviewed to illustrate these biases and how they may relate to efforts to promote money management skills among those with substance use disorders. Studies were identified by searching PubMed using the terms "behavioral economics" and "substance use disorders", reviewing bibliographies of published articles, and discussions with colleagues. Results: Only one of these biases (i.e., hyperbolic delay discounting) has been investigated extensively among those with SUDs. Indeed, it has been found to be sufficiently prevalent among those with SUDs to be considered as a potential risk factor for those disorders and certainly merits careful consideration in efforts to improve money management skills in that population. There has been relatively little empirical research reported regarding the other biases among those with SUDs, although they appear to be sufficiently fundamental to human behavior and relevant to the topic of money management (e.g., loss aversion) to also merit consideration. There is precedent of effective leveraging of behavioral economics principles in treatment development for SUDs (e.g., contingency management), including at least one intervention that explicitly focuses on money management (i.e., advisorteller money management therapy). Conclusions and Scientific Significance: The consideration of the systematic biases in human decision making that have been revealed in behavioral economics research has the potential to enhance efforts to devise effective strategies for improving money management skills among those with SUDs.
机译:背景:行为经济学研究显示,决策方面存在系统性偏见,在努力提高吸毒者(SUDs)的理财技巧时应考虑这些因素。目标:本文的目的是简要回顾一下有关以下五种偏见的文献(即,双曲线延迟贴现,违约和对现状的偏爱,损失规避,精神会计以及无法考虑机会成本)与资金管理主题特别相关。方法:对选定的研究进行回顾,以说明这些偏见以及这些偏见可能与在使用毒品的人群中提升理财技能的努力有关。通过使用术语“行为经济学”和“物质使用障碍”搜索PubMed,查看已发表文章的参考书目以及与同事讨论来确定研究。结果:在SUD患者中,只有一种偏见(即双曲线延迟贴现)得到了广泛的研究。确实,已经发现在SUD患儿中这种病已足够普遍,被认为是这些疾病的潜在危险因素,在改进该人群的理财技能方面,值得认真考虑。尽管SUD偏见对于人类行为而言已经足够基本,并且与理财主题(例如,损失规避)相关,但对于SUD偏见中的其他偏见而言,几乎没有关于实证研究的报道。在SUD的治疗开发中(例如,应急管理)有效利用行为经济学原理的先例,包括至少一种明确关注金钱管理的干预措施(即顾问钱管理疗法)。结论和科学意义:行为经济学研究中揭示的对人类决策系统偏见的考虑有可能加强努力,以制定有效的策略来改善SUD人群的理财技巧。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号