...
首页> 外文期刊>The American journal of emergency medicine >Derivation of a clinical guideline for the assessment of nonspecific abdominal pain: the Guideline for Abdominal Pain in the ED Setting (GAPEDS) Phase 1 Study.
【24h】

Derivation of a clinical guideline for the assessment of nonspecific abdominal pain: the Guideline for Abdominal Pain in the ED Setting (GAPEDS) Phase 1 Study.

机译:得出用于评估非特异性腹痛的临床指南:ED环境(GAPEDS)1期研究中的腹部疼痛指南。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to identify a clinical guideline for the evaluation of nonspecific abdominal pain (NSAP) using history, physical examination, laboratory analysis, acute abdominal series (AAS) radiographs, and nonenhanced helical computed tomography (NHCT) clinical predictor variables (CPVs). SETTING: The setting of this study was at an urban emergency department (ED) with 70000 yearly visits. METHODS: This is an institutional review board-approved, prospective, observational study. The primary outcome variable was urgent intervention (UI), defined as a diagnosis requiring surgical or medical treatment to prevent death or major morbidity. Subjects underwent prompted history, physical, laboratory studies, AAS, and NHCT and were followed up to 6 months for ultimate diagnosis and outcome. CPVs were subjected to classification and regression tree analysis. RESULTS: One hundred sixty-five subjects were analyzed. Thirteen percent of subjects required UI within 24 hours of presentation; an additional 34% underwent elective interventions that mitigated morbidity or mortality. Four guideline models were generated. Model 1 consisted of history and physical, with a sensitivity of 25%, a specificity of 92%, a positive likelihood ratio of 3.17, and a negative likelihood ratio of 0.81. Model 2 consisted of model 1 with laboratory, with a sensitivity of 39%, a specificity of 88%, a positive likelihood ratio of 3.25, and a negative likelihood ratio of 0.69. Model 3 consisted of model 2 with AAS, with a sensitivity of 56%, a specificity of 81%, a positive likelihood ratio of 2.94, and a negative likelihood ratio of 0.54. Model 4 comprised all inputs, including NHCT, with a sensitivity of 92%, a specificity of 90%, a positive likelihood ratio of 9.2, and a negative likelihood ratio of 0.089. NHCT was the single most accurate CPV for UI. CONCLUSIONS: No clinical guideline was identified exclusive of NHCT that possessed adequate sensitivity for exclusion of UI. NHCT is a rational choice fordecision support in the evaluation of NSAP and is likely the single most useful diagnostic adjunct available to augment the clinical evaluation.
机译:目的:本研究的目的是通过历史,体格检查,实验室分析,急性腹部系列(AAS)射线照片和非增强型螺旋计算机断层扫描(NHCT)临床预测指标,确定评估非特异性腹痛(NSAP)的临床指南变量(CPV)。地点:这项研究的地点是在城市急诊科(ED),每年有70000次访视。方法:这是经过机构审查委员会批准的前瞻性观察研究。主要结果变量是紧急干预(UI),定义为需要手术或药物治疗以防止死亡或重大发病的诊断。对受试者进行提示的病史,物理,实验室研究,AAS和NHCT,并随访6个月以进行最终诊断和结果。对CPV进行分类和回归树分析。结果:对165例受试者进行了分析。 13%的受试者在演示后的24小时内需要UI;另外有34%的人接受了选择性干预,以降低发病率或死亡率。生成了四个准则模型。模型1由病史和身体组成,敏感性为25%,特异性为92%,正似然比为3.17,负似然比为0.81。模型2由带有实验室的模型1组成,灵敏度为39%,特异性为88%,正似然比为3.25,负似然比为0.69。模型3由具有AAS的模型2组成,灵敏度为56%,特异性为81%,正似然比为2.94,负似然比为0.54。模型4包括所有输入,包括NHCT,灵敏度为92%,特异性为90%,正似然比为9.2,负似然比为0.089。 NHCT是用于UI的最准确的CPV。结论:没有确定NHCT除外的临床指南,NHCT具有排除UI的足够敏感性。 NHCT是评估NSAP的决策支持的合理选择,并且很可能是唯一最有用的诊断辅助手段,可用于增强临床评估。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号