首页> 外文期刊>The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition: Official Journal of the American Society for Clinical Nutrition >No difference in body weight decrease between a low-glycemic-index and a high-glycemic-index diet but reduced LDL cholesterol after 10-wk ad libitum intake of the low-glycemic-index diet.
【24h】

No difference in body weight decrease between a low-glycemic-index and a high-glycemic-index diet but reduced LDL cholesterol after 10-wk ad libitum intake of the low-glycemic-index diet.

机译:低血糖指数饮食和高血糖指数饮食之间的体重下降没有差异,但是低血糖指数饮食随意摄入10周后,LDL胆固醇降低。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

BACKGROUND: The role of glycemic index (GI) in appetite and body-weight regulation is still not clear. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to investigate the long-term effects of a low-fat, high-carbohydrate diet with either low glycemic index (LGI) or high glycemic index (HGI) on ad libitum energy intake, body weight, and composition, as well as on risk factors for type 2 diabetes and ischemic heart disease in overweight healthy subjects. DESIGN: The study was a 10-wk parallel, randomized, intervention trial with 2 matched groups. The LGI or HGI test foods, given as replacements for the subjects' usual carbohydrate-rich foods, were equal in total energy, energy density, dietary fiber, and macronutrient composition. Subjects were 45 (LGI diet: n = 23; HGI diet: n = 22) healthy overweight [body mass index (in kg/m(2)): 27.6 +/- 0.2] women aged 20-40 y. RESULTS: Energy intake, mean (+/- SEM) body weight (LGI diet: -1.9 +/- 0.5 kg; HGI diet: -1.3 +/- 0.3 kg), and fat mass (LGI diet: -1.0 +/- 0.4 kg;HGI diet: -0.4 +/- 0.3 kg) decreased over time, but the differences between groups were not significant. No significant differences were observed between groups in fasting serum insulin, homeostasis model assessment for relative insulin resistance, homeostasis model assessment for beta cell function, triacylglycerol, nonesterified fatty acids, or HDL cholesterol. However, a 10% decrease in LDL cholesterol (P < 0.05) and a tendency to a larger decrease in total cholesterol (P = 0.06) were observed with consumption of the LGI diet as compared with the HGI diet. CONCLUSIONS: This study does not support the contention that low-fat LGI diets are more beneficial than HGI diets with regard to appetite or body-weight regulation as evaluated over 10 wk. However, it confirms previous findings of a beneficial effect of LGI diets on risk factors for ischemic heart disease.
机译:背景:血糖指数(GI)在食欲和体重调节中的作用尚不清楚。目的:本研究的目的是研究低脂高碳水化合物饮食(低血糖指数(LGI)或高血糖指数(HGI))对随意摄入能量,体重和体重的长期影响。组成以及超重健康受试者中2型糖尿病和缺血性心脏病的危险因素。设计:该研究是一项10周平行,随机,有2个配对组的干预性试验。 LGI或HGI测试食品替代了受试者常用的富含碳水化合物的食品,其总能量,能量密度,膳食纤维和大量营养成分均相同。受试者为45岁(LGI饮食:n = 23; HGI饮食:n = 22)健康超重[体重指数(以kg / m(2)计:27.6 +/- 0.2)],年龄20-40岁。结果:能量摄入,平均体重(+/- SEM)(LGI饮食:-1.9 +/- 0.5公斤; HGI饮食:-1.3 +/- 0.3公斤)和脂肪量(LGI饮食:-1.0 +/- 0.4公斤; HGI饮食:-0.4 +/- 0.3公斤)随时间减少,但两组之间的差异并不显着。两组之间的空腹血清胰岛素,相对胰岛素抵抗的稳态模型评估,β细胞功能的稳态模型评估,三酰甘油,非酯化脂肪酸或HDL胆固醇之间未观察到显着差异。然而,与HGI饮食相比,食用LGI饮食可观察到LDL胆固醇降低10%(P <0.05),总胆固醇有较大降低的趋势(P = 0.06)。结论:本研究不支持低脂LGI饮食在食欲或体重调节方面优于HGI饮食(经10周评估)的观点。但是,它证实了先前的发现,即LGI饮食对缺血性心脏病的危险因素具有有益作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号