首页> 外文期刊>The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition: Official Journal of the American Society for Clinical Nutrition >Comparison of multifrequency bioelectrical impedance analysis with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry for assessment of percentage body fat in a large, healthy population
【24h】

Comparison of multifrequency bioelectrical impedance analysis with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry for assessment of percentage body fat in a large, healthy population

机译:多频生物电阻抗分析与双能X线骨密度仪的比较,用于评估一个大型健康人群的体脂百分比

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) is widely used in clinics and research to measure body composition. However, the results of BIA validation with reference methods are contradictory, and few data are available on the influence of adiposity on the measurement of body composition by BIA. OBJECTIVE: The goal was to determine the effects of sex and adiposity on the difference in percentage body fat (%BF) predicted by BIA compared with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). DESIGN: A total of 591 healthy subjects were recruited in Newfoundland and Labrador. %BF was predicted by using BIA and was compared with that measured by DXA. Methods agreement was assessed by Pearson's correlation and Bland and Altman analysis. Differences in %BF among groups based on sex and adiposity were analyzed by using one-factor analysis of variance with Bonferroni correction. RESULTS: Correlations between BIA and DXA were 0.88 for the whole population, 0.78 for men, and 0.85 for women. The mean %BF determined by BIA (32.89 +/- 8.00%) was significantly lower than that measured by DXA (34.72 +/- 8.66%). The cutoffs were sex specific. BIA overestimated %BF by 3.03% and 4.40% when %BF was <15% in men and <25% in women, respectively, and underestimated %BF by 4.32% and 2.71% when %BF was >25% in men and >33% in women, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: BIA is a good alternative for estimating %BF when subjects are within a normal body fat range. BIA tends to overestimate %BF in lean subjects and underestimate %BF in obese subjects.
机译:背景:生物电阻抗分析(BIA)在临床和研究中广泛用于测量人体成分。但是,使用参考方法进行BIA验证的结果是矛盾的,而且很少有数据可用于测定肥胖对BIA人体成分测量的影响。目的:确定性别和肥胖对BIA与双能X线骨密度仪(DXA)相比所预测的BIA预测的体内脂肪百分比(%BF)差异的影响。设计:在纽芬兰和拉布拉多共招募了591名健康受试者。使用BIA可以预测%BF,并将其与DXA进行比较。方法的一致性通过皮尔森相关性以及布兰德和奥特曼分析进行评估。通过使用Bonferroni校正的单因素方差分析,分析了基于性别和肥胖的各组之间%BF的差异。结果:BIA和DXA之间的相关性在整个人群中为0.88,男性为0.78,女性为0.85。 BIA测定的平均%BF(32.89 +/- 8.00%)明显低于DXA测得的平均%BF(34.72 +/- 8.66%)。临界值是针对性别的。当%BF <15%的男性和<25%的女性,BIA分别高估了%BF 3.03%和4.40%,而当%BF> 25%且男性> 33时,BIA分别低估了%BF 4.32%和2.71% %分别在妇女中。结论:当受试者处于正常体脂范围内时,BIA是评估%BF的好选择。 BIA倾向于高估瘦受试者的%BF,而低估肥胖受试者的%BF。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号