首页> 外文期刊>The American Journal of Cardiology >Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist use in hospitalized patients with heart failure, reduced ejection fraction, and diabetes mellitus (from the EVEREST trial)
【24h】

Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist use in hospitalized patients with heart failure, reduced ejection fraction, and diabetes mellitus (from the EVEREST trial)

机译:盐皮质激素受体拮抗剂在住院的心力衰竭,射血分数降低和糖尿病患者中的使用(来自EVEREST试验)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Despite the well-established benefits of mineralocorticoid receptor agonists (MRAs) in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, safety concerns remain in patients with concomitant diabetes mellitus (DM) because of common renal and electrolyte abnormalities in this population. We analyzed all-cause mortality and composite cardiovascular mortality and HF hospitalization over a median 9.9 months among 1,998 patients in the placebo arm of the Efficacy of Vasopressin Antagonism in Heart Failure Outcome Study With Tolvaptan (EVEREST) trial by DM status and discharge MRA use. Of the 750 patients with DM, 59.2% were receiving MRAs compared with 62.5% in the non-DM patients. DM patients not receiving MRAs were older, more likely to be men, with an ischemic heart failure etiology and slightly worse renal function compared with those receiving MRAs. After adjustment for baseline risk factors, among DM patients, MRA use was not associated with either mortality (hazard ratio [HR] 0.93; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.75 to 1.15) or the composite end point (HR 0.94; 95% CI 0.80 to 1.10). Similar findings were seen in non-DM patients (mortality [HR 1.01; 95% CI 0.84 to 1.22] or the composite end point [HR 0.98; 95% CI 0.85 to 1.13] [p >0.43 for DM interaction]). In conclusion, in-hospital initiation of MRA therapy was low (15% to 20%), and overall discharge MRA use was only 60% (with regional variation), regardless of DM status. There does not appear to be clear, clinically significant in-hospital hemodynamic or even renal differences between those on and off MRA. Discharge MRA use was not associated with postdischarge end points in patients hospitalized for worsening heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and co-morbid DM. DM does not appear to influence the effectiveness of MRA therapy.
机译:尽管盐皮质激素受体激动剂(MRA)在心力衰竭且射血分数降低方面具有公认的优势,但由于该人群中常见的肾脏和电解质异常,因此伴随糖尿病(DM)的患者仍存在安全隐患。我们根据DM状态和出院MRA的使用情况,分析了托伐普坦(EVEREST)心衰结果研究(EVAEST)中1,998例安慰剂治疗组中1,998例安慰剂患者的中位9.9个月的全因死亡率,复合心血管死亡率和HF住院情况。在750名DM患者中,接受MRA的占59.2%,而非DM患者则为62.5%。与未接受MRA的DM患者相比,未接受MRA的DM患者年龄更大,更可能是男性,具有缺血性心力衰竭病因,肾功能稍差。在调整了基线危险因素后,DM患者中,MRA的使用与死亡率(危险比[HR] 0.93; 95%置信区间[CI] 0.75至1.15)或复合终点(HR 0.94; 95%CI)无关0.80至1.10)。在非DM患者中也观察到了类似的发现(死亡率[HR 1.01; 95%CI 0.84至1.22]或复合终点[HR 0.98; 95%CI 0.85至1.13] [DM相互作用p> 0.43])。总之,无论DM状况如何,MRA治疗的院内启动率都很低(15%至20%),而出院MRA的总使用率仅为60%(随区域变化)。在MRA上和下的MRA之间似乎没有明确的,临床上有意义的院内血流动力学甚至肾脏差异。因出院率降低和合并病态DM而使心力衰竭恶化的住院患者,出院后MRA的使用与出院后终点无关。 DM似乎并不影响MRA疗法的有效性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号