首页> 外文期刊>The American Journal of Cardiology >Comparison of coronary flow velocity reserve measurement by transthoracic doppler echocardiography with 320-row multidetector computed tomographic coronary angiography in the detection of in-stent restenosis in the three major coronary arteries
【24h】

Comparison of coronary flow velocity reserve measurement by transthoracic doppler echocardiography with 320-row multidetector computed tomographic coronary angiography in the detection of in-stent restenosis in the three major coronary arteries

机译:经胸多普勒超声心动图与320行多探测器CT冠状动脉造影在三大冠状动脉支架内再狭窄检测中比较冠状动脉血流储备量

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We sought to compare the diagnostic accuracy and feasibility of coronary flow velocity reserve (CFVR) measurement using transthoracic Doppler echocardiography (TTDE) and 320-row multidetector computed tomographic coronary angiography (CTCA) for predicting in-stent restenosis (ISR). We enrolled 126 consecutive patients with 309 implanted coronary stents in the 3 major coronary arteries. TTDE and CTCA were performed within the 2-week period before follow-up invasive coronary angiography. Binary ISR was defined as percent diameter stenosis <50% on invasive coronary angiogram. A CFVR <2.0 using TTDE and a narrowing of <50% measured with CTCA were the thresholds indicating the presence of binary ISR. Presence of ISR using invasive coronary angiography was observed in 26 (8%) stents and 26 (14%) vessels. Feasibilities of CFVR measurement and CTCA for predicting ISR in the 3 major vessels were 94% and 91%, respectively. A CFVR <2.0 revealed a 95% diagnostic accuracy with sensitivity of 87%, specificity of 96%, positive predictive value of 77%, and negative predictive value of 98%. Diagnostic accuracy of CTCA was comparable to that of CFVR measurement; however, CTC angiographic results were confounded by metal artifacts in the assessment of small-diameter stents. In conclusion, noninvasive CFVR measurement has high feasibility and accuracy for predicting ISR and is comparable to 320-row CTCA.
机译:我们试图比较经胸多普勒超声心动图(TTDE)和320行多探测器计算机断层扫描冠状动脉造影(CTCA)预测支架内再狭窄(ISR)的冠状动脉血流储备量(CFVR)的诊断准确性和可行性。我们招募了126例连续的患者,分别在3个主要的冠状动脉中植入了309枚冠状动脉支架。 TTDE和CTCA在随访期有创冠状动脉造影之前2周内进行。二进制ISR被定义为侵入性冠状动脉造影上的直径狭窄百分比<50%。使用TTDE的CFVR <2.0和使用CTCA测得的缩窄<50%是表明存在二元ISR的阈值。在26(8%)个支架和26(14%)个血管中观察到使用侵入性冠状动脉造影的ISR的存在。 CFVR测量和CTCA预测3条主要血管ISR的可行性分别为94%和91%。 CFVR <2.0显示出95%的诊断准确性,灵敏度为87%,特异性为96%,阳性预测值为77%,阴性预测值为98%。 CTCA的诊断准确性可与CFVR测量相媲美。但是,在评估小直径支架时,CTC血管造影结果与金属假象相混淆。总之,无创CFVR测量具有预测ISR的高度可行性和准确性,可与320行CTCA相提并论。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号