...
首页> 外文期刊>The American Journal of Cardiology >The Usefulness of Ranolazine for the Treatment of Refractory Chronic Stable Angina Pectoris as Determined from a Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials
【24h】

The Usefulness of Ranolazine for the Treatment of Refractory Chronic Stable Angina Pectoris as Determined from a Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials

机译:从随机对照试验的系统评价确定雷诺嗪在治疗难治性慢性稳定型心绞痛的有用性。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Despite the use of traditional antianginal medications (i.e., P blockers, calcium channel blockers, and nitrates) and revascularization therapies, symptoms of chronic stable angina pectoris (CSAP) persist in >=25% of patients. The objective of this systematic review was to synthesize the available evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of ranolazine for the treatment of CSAP. We systematically searched the Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials, EMBASE, and MEDLINE through July 2013 for RCTs comparing ranolazine with placebo or antianginal medications administered as part of usual care for the management of CSAP. End points of interest included exercise stress test performance (duration, time to angina, and time to ST-segment depression), frequency of angina attacks/week, nitroglycerin use/week, and quality of life. We identified 7 RCTs (n = 3,317) of patients with CSAP due to coronary artery disease. Comparators included placebo, amlodipine, and atenolol. All but 1 trial showed a statistically significant improvement in all 3 exercise stress test parameters with ranolazine compared with placebo. Ranolazine also reduced angina frequency and nitroglycerin use compared with placebo. These findings were consistent whether or not patients were also prescribed traditional antianginal pharmacotherapy. In conclusion, ranolazine reduces anginal symptoms among patients with symptomatic CSAP despite their use of traditional antianginal medications.
机译:尽管使用了传统的抗心绞痛药物(即P受体阻滞剂,钙通道阻滞剂和硝酸盐)和血运重建疗法,但≥25%的患者持续出现慢性稳定型心绞痛(CSAP)症状。这项系统评价的目的是综合雷诺嗪治疗CSAP的随机对照试验(RCT)可获得的证据。我们系统地搜索了截至2013年7月的对照试验的Cochrane登记册,EMBASE和MEDLINE,以比较将雷诺嗪与安慰剂或抗心绞痛药物(作为CSAP管理的常规护理的一部分)进行比较的RCT。研究的终点包括运动压力测试表现(持续时间,心绞痛发作时间和ST段压低的时间),心绞痛发作的频率/周,硝酸甘油的使用/周和生活质量。我们确定了由于冠状动脉疾病导致的CSAP患者的7个RCT(n = 3,317)。比较剂包括安慰剂,氨氯地平和阿替洛尔。除一项试验外,所有其他研究均显示,与安慰剂相比,雷诺嗪对所有3个运动压力测试参数均具有统计学上的显着改善。与安慰剂相比,雷诺嗪还减少了心绞痛发作频率和硝酸甘油的使用。无论患者是否还接受了传统的抗心绞痛药物治疗,这些发现是一致的。总之,雷诺嗪可减轻症状性CSAP患者的心绞痛症状,尽管他们使用了传统的抗心绞痛药物。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号