首页> 外文期刊>The American Journal of Cardiology >Comparison of one-year outcome (death and rehospitalization) in hospitalized heart failure patients with left ventricular ejection fraction >50% versus those with ejection fraction <50%.
【24h】

Comparison of one-year outcome (death and rehospitalization) in hospitalized heart failure patients with left ventricular ejection fraction >50% versus those with ejection fraction <50%.

机译:左心室射血分数> 50%的住院心力衰竭患者与射血分数<50%的住院心力衰竭患者一年结局(死亡和再次住院)的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Heart failure (HF) with preserved systolic function (ejection fraction [EF] 50%) is common, yet no proven therapies exist. Large registries could shed light on what medications may or may not be useful to reduce hospitalization and mortality. The EFFECT Registry, which prospectively enrolled 9,943 patients admitted to the hospital for HF from 1999 to 2001 in 103 hospitals in Ontario, Canada, was used. Patients discharged alive were divided into those with EF 50% and EF 50%. Discharge medications (angiotensin-converting enzyme [ACE] inhibitors, beta blockers [BBs], spironolactone, and digoxin) were examined for their association with HF rehospitalization or death during 1 year. In the HF group with EF 50% (n = 1,026), 199 patients died within 1 year and 349 patients died or were hospitalized for HF within 1 year. In the HF group with EF 50% (n = 1,898), 427 patients died and 720 patients died or were hospitalized for HF. In the HF group with EF 50%, 67% were administered an ACE inhibitor; 32%, a BB; 37%, digoxin; and 12%, spironolactone. No differences were seen in adjusted survival for any medications (ACE inhibitors, BBs, digoxin, or spironolactone) examined in the HF group with EF 50% despite an adjusted survival benefit with ACE inhibitors (hazard ratio [HR] 0.85, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.77 to 0.94), BBs (HR 0.80, 95% CI 0.72 to 0.89), and spironolactone (HR 0.80, 95% CI 0.66 to 0.98) in patients with low EF. In conclusion, none of the medications proved to improve outcomes in patients with HF with low EF showed an association with outcomes in patients with HF and EF 50%, highlighting the need for randomized trial evidence to define therapies that will be beneficial in patients with HF and preserved systolic function.
机译:保留收缩功能(射血分数[EF]> 50%)的心力衰竭(HF)很常见,但尚无行之有效的疗法。大型注册机构可能会揭示哪些药物可能会或可能不会有助于降低住院率和死亡率。使用了EFFECT注册中心,该注册中心从1999年至2001年在加拿大安大略省的103所医院中纳入了9943名因心力衰竭入院的患者。存活出院的患者分为EF> 50%和EF <50%。检查了出院药物(血管紧张素转换酶[ACE]抑制剂,β受体阻滞剂[BBs],螺内酯和地高辛)在1年内与HF再次住院或死亡的相关性。在EF> 50%(n = 1,026)的HF组中,199名患者在1年内死亡,349名患者在1年内死亡或住院治疗。在EF <50%的HF组(n = 1,898)中,有427例患者死亡,720例患者死亡或因HF而住院。在EF> 50%的HF组中,有67%的患者使用了ACE抑制剂。 32%,BB; 37%地高辛;和12%的螺内酯。尽管ACE抑制剂具有调整后的生存获益(风险比[HR] 0.85,置信度95%),但HF> 50%的HF组中检查的任何药物(ACE抑制剂,BBs,地高辛或螺内酯)的调整生存期均无差异。 EF较低的患者,区间[CI]为0.77至0.94),BBs(HR为0.80、95%CI为0.72至0.89)和螺内酯(HR 0.80、95%CI为0.66至0.98)。总之,没有一种药物被证明能改善EF低的HF患者的预后,但与HF和EF> 50%的患者的预后相关,这突出表明需要随机试验证据来定义对以下患者有益的疗法: HF和保留的收缩功能。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号