首页> 外文期刊>The American Journal of Cardiology >Automated Computer-Assisted Diagnosis of Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease in Emergency Department Patients Undergoing 256-Slice Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography for Acute Chest Pain
【24h】

Automated Computer-Assisted Diagnosis of Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease in Emergency Department Patients Undergoing 256-Slice Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography for Acute Chest Pain

机译:急诊患者接受256层冠状动脉计算机断层扫描血管造影以诊断急性胸痛的自动计算机辅助诊断阻塞性冠状动脉疾病

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

A 256-slice coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) is an accurate method for detection and exclusion of obstructive coronary artery disease (OBS-CAD). However, accurate image interpretation requires expertise and may not be available at all hours. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of a fully automated computer-assisted diagnosis (COMP-DIAG) tool for exclusion of OBS-CAD in patients in the emergency department (ED) presenting with chest pain. Three hundred sixty-nine patients in ED without known coronary disease underwent 256-slice CCTA as part. of the assessment of chest pain of uncertain origin. COMP-DIAG (CorAnalyzer II) automatically reported presence or exclusion of OBS-CAD (>50% stenosis, >= 1 vessel). Performance characteristics of COMP-DIAG for exclusion and detection of OBS-CAD were determined using expert reading as the reference standard. Seventeen (5%) studies were unassessable by COMP-DIAG software, and 352 patients (1,056 vessels) were therefore available for analysis. COMP-DIAG identified 33% of assessable studies as having OBS-CAD, but the prevalence of OBS-CAD on CCTA was only 18% (66 of 352 patients) by standard expert reading. However, COMP-DIAG correctly identified 61 of the 66 patients (93%) with OBS-CAD with 21 vessels (2%) with OBS-CAD misclassified as negative. In conclusion, compared to expert reading, automated computer-assisted diagnosis using the CorAnalyzer showed high sensitivity but only moderate specificity for detection of obstructive coronary disease in patients in ED who underwent 256-slice CCTA. The high negative predictive value of this computer-assisted algorithm may be useful in the ED setting. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
机译:256层冠状动脉计算机断层血管造影术(CCTA)是检测和排除阻塞性冠状动脉疾病(OBS-CAD)的准确方法。但是,准确的图像解释需要专业知识,可能并非始终可用。这项研究的目的是评估一种全自动计算机辅助诊断(COMP-DIAG)工具在排除胸痛的急诊科(ED)患者中排除OBS-CAD的有用性。 369例没有已知冠心病的ED患者接受了256层CCTA检查。不确定来源的胸痛的评估。 COMP-DIAG(CorAnalyzer II)自动报告OBS-CAD的存在或排除(狭窄> 50%,> = 1个血管)。使用专家阅读作为参考标准,确定用于排除和检测OBS-CAD的COMP-DIAG的性能特征。 COMP-DIAG软件无法评估十七(5%)个研究,因此有352位患者(1,056个血管)可供分析。通过标准专家阅读,COMP-DIAG确定了33%的可评估研究为OBS-CAD,但CCTA上OBS-CAD的患病率仅为18%(352例患者中的66例)。但是,COMP-DIAG正确识别了66例OBS-CAD患者中的61例(93%),其中21例血管(2%)的OBS-CAD被误分类为阴性。总之,与专家阅读相比,使用CorAnalyzer进行的自动计算机辅助诊断显示出高灵敏度,但对接受256层CCTA的ED患者的阻塞性冠状动脉疾病的检测仅具有中等特异性。此计算机辅助算法的高负预测值在ED设置中可能有用。 (C)2015 Elsevier Inc.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号