首页> 外文期刊>The American Journal of Cardiology >Evaluation of 5 Prognostic Scores for Prediction of Stroke, Thromboembolic and Coronary Events, All-Cause Mortality, and Major Adverse Cardiac Events in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation and Coronary Stenting
【24h】

Evaluation of 5 Prognostic Scores for Prediction of Stroke, Thromboembolic and Coronary Events, All-Cause Mortality, and Major Adverse Cardiac Events in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation and Coronary Stenting

机译:评估房颤和冠状动脉支架置入术中风,血栓栓塞和冠状动脉事件,全因死亡率和主要不良心脏事件的5个预后评分

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Management of antithrombotic therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and coronary stenting remains challenging, and there is a need for efficient tools to predict their risk of different types of cardiovascular events and death. Several scores exist such as the CHA(2)DS(2)-VASc score, the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) score, the Synergy between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with Taxus and Cardiac Surgery (SYNTAX) score, the Anatomical and Clinical Syntax II Score and the Reduction of Atherothrombosis for Continued Health score. These 5 scores were investigated in patients with AF with coronary stenting with the aim of determining which was most predictive for stroke/thromboembolic (TE) events, nonlethal coronary events, all-cause mortality, and major adverse cardiac events (MACE). Among 845 patients with AF with coronary stenting seen from 2000 to 2014, 440 (52%) were admitted for acute coronary syndrome and 405 (48%) for elective percutaneous coronary intervention. The rate of cardiovascular complication was at 14.1% per year, and nonlethal coronary events were the most frequent complications with a yearly rate of 6.5%. CHA(2)DS(2)-VASc score was the best predictor of stroke/TE events with a c-statistic of 0.604 (95% CI 0.567 to 0.639) and a best cut-off point of 5. SYNTAX score was better to predict nonlethal coronary events and MACE with c-statistics of 0.634 (95% CI 0.598 to 0.669) and 0.612 (95% CI 0.575 to 0.647), respectively, with a best cut-off point of 9. GRACE score appeared to be the best to predict all-cause mortality with a c-statistic of 0.682 (95% CI 0.646 to 0.717) and a best cut-off point of 153. In conclusions, among validated scores, none is currently robust enough to simultaneously predict stroke/TE events, nonlethal coronary events, death, and MACE in patients with AF with stents. The CHA(2)DS(2)-VASc score remained the best score to assess stroke/TE risk, as was the SYNTAX score for nonlethal coronary events and MACE, and finally, the GRACE score for all-cause mortality in this study population. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
机译:在房颤(AF)和冠状动脉支架置入术中,抗血栓治疗的管理仍具有挑战性,因此需要一种有效的工具来预测其发生不同类型的心血管事件和死亡的风险。存在一些评分,例如CHA(2)DS(2)-VASc评分,急性冠脉事件全球注册(GRACE)评分,经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与红杉和心脏手术之间的协同作用(SYNTAX)评分,解剖学和临床语法II得分和持续健康得分的动脉粥样硬化减少。在患有冠状动脉支架置入性房颤的患者中调查了这5个评分,目的是确定哪种卒中/血栓栓塞(TE)事件,非致命性冠状动脉事件,全因死亡率和主要不良心脏事件(MACE)最能预测。在2000年至2014年间观察的845例AF冠状动脉支架置入患者中,有440例(52%)因急性冠状动脉综合征而入院,有405例(48%)因选择性经皮冠状动脉介入治疗而入院。心血管并发症的发生率为每年14.1%,非致命性冠状动脉事件是最常见的并发症,每年发生率为6.5%。 CHA(2)DS(2)-VASc得分是卒中/ TE事件的最佳预测指标,c-统计量为0.604(95%CI 0.567至0.639),最佳临界点为5。SYNTAX得分优于预测非致死性冠状动脉事件和MACE的c统计量分别为0.634(95%CI 0.598至0.669)和0.612(95%CI 0.575至0.647),最佳临界点为9。GRACE评分似乎是最好的预测全因死亡率,c统计量为0.682(95%CI为0.646至0.717),最佳临界点为153。总之,在经过验证的评分中,目前尚没有足够的稳健性同时预测卒中/ TE事件支架置入性房颤患者的非致命性冠状动脉事件,死亡和MACE。 CHA(2)DS(2)-VASc评分仍然是评估中风/ TE风险的最佳评分,非致命性冠心病和MACE的SYNTAX评分,以及该研究人群中全因死亡率的GRACE评分。 (C)2016 Elsevier Inc.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号