...
首页> 外文期刊>The American Journal of Cardiology >Diagnostic and Therapeutic Usefulness of Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography in Out-Clinic Patients Referred for Chest Pain
【24h】

Diagnostic and Therapeutic Usefulness of Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography in Out-Clinic Patients Referred for Chest Pain

机译:冠状计算机断层扫描血管造影在胸痛转诊的非临床患者中的诊断和治疗价值

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) is widely used to exclude coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients with low-to-intermediate pretest probability (PTP) of obstructive CAD. The aim of our study was to investigate the reclassification by CCTA and the implications of CCTA results on management because limited studies exist on these subjects; 1,560 patients with chest pain without a history of CAD and with low or intermediate PTP of CAD referred for CCTA from the out-patient clinic were prospectively included. PTP was defined by the Duke Clinical Score as either low (<15%), low-intermediate (15% to 50%), or high-intermediate (50% to 85%). Distribution of CCTA results among the categories of PTP of CAD and the influence of CCTA results on management were analyzed. CCTA revealed obstructive CAD in 7%, 15%, and 23% of cases, in patients with low, low-intermediate, and high-intermediate PTP, respectively; 855 of 1,031 patients (83%) with intermediate PTP of CAD showed no obstructive CAD on CCTA and were consequently reclassified. Management changes after CCTA occurred in 689 patients (44%). In 633 patients (41%), medication was altered and 135 (9%) were referred for invasive coronary angiography. Treatment with statin was initiated in 442 (28%) and stopped in 71 patients (5%). Aspirin was initiated in 192(12%) and stopped in 139 patients (9%). In conclusion, in a routine clinical cohort, CCTA resulted in reclassification in most patients. Furthermore, our study suggests that the Duke Clinical Score overestimates the probability of obstructive CAD compared with CCTA findings. Finally, CCTA results have implications on patient management, with medication changes in 41% of patients. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
机译:冠状动脉计算机断层血管造影术(CCTA)被广泛用于排除阻塞性CAD的中低预测试概率(PTP)的患者的冠状动脉疾病(CAD)。我们研究的目的是调查CCTA的重新分类以及CCTA结果对管理的影响,因为对这些主题的研究有限。前瞻性纳入了1,560名无CAD历史的胸痛患者,且门诊由CCTA转诊的CAD PTP较低或中等。杜克临床评分将PTP定义为低(<15%),低中级(15%至50%)或高中级(50%至85%)。分析了CCTA结果在CAD PTP类别中的分布以及CCTA结果对管理的影响。 CCTA分别在低,低中和高中PTP患者中发现阻塞性CAD的发生率分别为7%,15%和23%。 1,031名中度CAD PTP患者中有855名(83%)在CCTA上未显示阻塞性CAD,因此被重新分类。 689例患者中发生CCTA后管理发生变化(44%)。在633例患者(41%)中,药物治疗发生了变化,并且有135例患者(9%)被推荐进行有创冠状动脉造影。他汀类药物的治疗始于442(28%),71例患者(5%)停止。 192(12%)位患者开始服用阿司匹林,139例患者(9%)停用阿司匹林。总之,在常规临床队列中,CCTA对大多数患者进行了重新分类。此外,我们的研究表明,与CCTA相比,杜克临床评分高估了阻塞性CAD的可能性。最后,CCTA的结果对患者管理产生了影响,41%的患者药物治疗发生了变化。 (C)2015 Elsevier Inc.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号