...
【24h】

Ambulatory 24-hour double-probe pH monitoring: the importance of manometry.

机译:动态24小时双探头pH监测:测压的重要性。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

OBJECTIVE: Historically, manometry has been used for sphincter localization before ambulatory 24-hour double-probe pH monitoring to ensure accurate placement of the probes. Recently, direct-vision placement (DVP), using transnasal fiberoptic laryngoscopy (TFL), has been offered as an alternative technique. Presumably, DVP might be used to precisely place the proximal (pharyngeal) pH probe; however, using DVP, there appears to be no way to accurately position the distal (esophageal) probe. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of DVP for pH probe placement using manometric measurement as the gold standard. METHODS: Thirty patients undergoing pH monitoring participated in this prospective study. Each subject underwent manometric examination of the esophagus to determine the precise location of the upper and lower esophageal sphincters (UES and LES). In addition, external anatomic landmarks were used to estimate interprobe distances. A physician blinded to the manometry results then placed a pH catheter using DVP so that the proximal probe was located just above the UES. The results were recorded and compared with those obtained by manometry. RESULTS: Accurate DVP of the proximal pH probe was achieved in 70% (23 of 30) of the subjects. The use of external anatomic landmarks to estimate interprobe distance resulted in accurate positioning of the distal probe in only 40% (12 of 30) of the subjects. Using fixed interprobe distances of 15 cm and 20 cm, distal probe position accuracy was 3% (1 of 30) and 40% (12 of 30), respectively. Therefore, using DVP, the distal esophageal probe was in an incorrect position in 60% to 97% of subjects. CONCLUSION: For double-probe pH monitoring, the proximal probe can be accurately positioned by DVP; however, there is no precise way to determine the interprobe distance required to correctly position the distal pH probe. Failure to accurately position the distal probe results in grossly inaccurate esophageal acid-exposure times. Thus, manometry is needed to ensure valid double-probe pH monitoring data.
机译:目的:从历史上看,动态血压一直被用于括约肌定位,然后再进行动态24小时双探头pH监测,以确保准确放置探头。近来,已经提供了使用经鼻纤维喉镜检查(TFL)的直接视觉放置(DVP)作为替代技术。据推测,DVP可以用于精确放置近端(咽部)pH探针。但是,使用DVP似乎无法准确定位远端(食道)探头。这项研究的目的是使用测压法作为金标准评估DVP用于pH探头放置的准确性。方法:30名接受pH监测的患者参加了这项前瞻性研究。每个受试者均接受食道压力测定,以确定上下食道括约肌(UES和LES)的确切位置。此外,使用外部解剖界标来估计探头之间的距离。对测压结果不知情的医生随后使用DVP放置了pH导管,以使近端探头位于UES的正上方。记录结果并将其与通过测压法获得的结果进行比较。结果:近端pH探针的正确DVP在70%(23/30)的受试者中达到。使用外部解剖学界标来估计探头间距离导致仅40%(30个中的12个)受试者可以精确定位远端探头。使用15 cm和20 cm的固定探针间距,远端探头的位置精度分别为3%(30分之一)和40%(12分30)。因此,使用DVP,在60%至97%的受试者中,远端食管探针的位置不正确。结论:对于双探针pH监测,DVP可以精确定位近端探针;但是,没有精确的方法来确定正确定位远端pH探针所需的探针间距离。无法精确定位远端探头会导致食管酸暴露时间严重不准确。因此,需要进行测压以确保有效的双探针pH监测数据。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号