首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America >Temporal gap detection measured with multiple sinusoidal markers: Effects of marker number, frequency, and temporal position
【24h】

Temporal gap detection measured with multiple sinusoidal markers: Effects of marker number, frequency, and temporal position

机译:用多个正弦标记测量时间间隙:标记数量,频率和时间位置的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Detection thresholds were measured for silent temporal gaps within combinations of two, three, or four sinusoidal markers (i.e., combinations of one or two pre-gap markers with one or two post-gap markers). The markers were selected from the frequency range 2000-3100 Hz. Sinusoidal frequencies F_1 and F_4 were used as pre-gap markers, while F_2 and F_3 served as post-gap markers. Temporal gap detection (TGD) thresholds were measured from sets of three normal-hearing adults who tracked 70.7% correct detection thresholds adaptively across blocks of 50 two-interval, two-alternative, forced-choice trials. For symmetric marker conditions, where pre- and post-gap markers were equivalent in frequency (e.g., F_1 = F_2 or F_1 = F_2 and F_3 = F_4), TGD thresholds were <10 ms. However, for asymmetric marker frequency alignments across the silent gap, including stimulus configurations where only three markers were presented on a trial (e.g., F_1 = F_2, F_2 ≠ F_3, no F_4), performance was highly variable and was dramatically disrupted by the presentation of a second post-gap marker. The multiple-marker results reveal that TGD depends greatly on the number of markers presented, both in terms of the marker temporal position before and after the silent gap signal and the marker frequency alignment (symmetry) across the gap. These results, which cannot be predicted from models of the auditory periphery, may reflect perceptual mechanisms that are important in grouping and organizing auditory images.
机译:在两个,三个或四个正弦标记的组合(即一个或两个前间隙标记与一个或两个后间隙标记的组合)内测量无声时间间隙的检测阈值。标记选自2000-3100Hz的频率范围。正弦频率F_1和F_4用作间隙前标记,而F_2和F_3用作间隙后标记。从三个听力正常的成年人中测量时间间隙检测(TGD)阈值,这些成年人在50个两次间隔,两次或两次强迫选择试验的区块中自适应地跟踪了70.7%的正确检测阈值。对于对称标记条件,前间隙标记和后间隙标记的频率相同(例如F_1 = F_2或F_1 = F_2和F_3 = F_4),TGD阈值<10 ms。但是,对于整个无声间隙上的非对称标记频率对齐,包括仅在试验中显示三个标记的刺激配置(例如,F_1 = F_2,F_2≠F_3,无F_4),性能变化很大,并且受到显示的极大干扰第二个间隙后标记。多标记结果表明,无论是在无声隙信号之前或之后的标记时间位置,还是跨间隙的标记频率对齐(对称性),TGD都很大程度上取决于呈现的标记数。这些结果,无法从听觉外围模型预测,可能反映了感知机制,在分组和组织听觉图像中很重要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号