首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America >Comparison of the roex and gammachirp filters as representations of the auditory filter
【24h】

Comparison of the roex and gammachirp filters as representations of the auditory filter

机译:Roex和gammachirp过滤器作为听觉过滤器的表示形式的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Although the rounded-exponential (roex) filter has been successfully used to represent the magnitude response of the auditory filter, recent studies with the roex(p,w,t) filter reveal two serious problems: the fits to notched-noise masking data are somewhat unstable unless the filter is reduced to a physically unrealizable form, and there is no time-domain version of the roex(p, w, t) filter to support modeling of the perception of complex sounds. This paper describes a compressive gammachirp (cGC) filter with the same architecture as the roex(P I w,t) which can be implemented in the time domain. The gain and asymmetry of this parallel cGC filter are shown to be comparable to those of the roex(p,w,t) filter, but the fits to masking data are still somewhat unstable. The roex(p,w,t) and parallel cGC filters were also compared with the cascade cGC filter [Patterson et al., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 114, 1529-1542 (2003)], which was found to provide an equivalent fit with 25% fewer coefficients. Moreover, the fits were stable. The advantage of the cascade cGC filter appears to derive from its parsimonious representation of the high-frequency side of the filter. It is concluded that cGC filters offer better prospects than roex filters for the representation of the auditory filter. (c) 2006 Acoustical Society of America.
机译:尽管四舍五入(roex)滤波器已成功用于表示听觉滤波器的幅度响应,但最近对roex(p,w,t)滤波器的研究发现了两个严重的问题:陷波噪声掩盖数据的拟合是除非将滤波器简化为物理上无法实现的形式,否则它会有些不稳定,并且没有roex(p,w,t)滤波器的时域版本来支持对复杂声音的感知建模。本文描述了一种压缩的gachmachirp(cGC)滤波器,其结构与roex(P I w,t)相同,可以在时域中实现。该并行cGC滤波器的增益和不对称性可与roex(p,w,t)滤波器的增益和不对称性相比,但掩蔽数据的拟合仍然有些不稳定。还对roex(p,w,t)和并行cGC过滤器与级联cGC过滤器进行了比较[Patterson et al。,J. Acoust。 Soc。上午。 114,1529-1542(2003)],发现该算法可提供等效拟合,且系数减少25%。而且,拟合度是稳定的。级联cGC滤波器的优势似乎源自其对滤波器高频侧的简化表示。结论是,对于听觉过滤器的表示,cGC过滤器比roex过滤器具有更好的前景。 (c)2006年美国声学学会。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号