首页> 外文期刊>The Lichenologist >Morphological aspects associated with repair and regeneration in Lobaria pulmonaria and L. amplissitna (Peltigerales, Ascomycota)
【24h】

Morphological aspects associated with repair and regeneration in Lobaria pulmonaria and L. amplissitna (Peltigerales, Ascomycota)

机译:肺叶肺病和L. amplissitna(Peltigerales,子囊)的修复和再生相关的形态学方面

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

In lichens with a competitive ecological strategy, reproduction, dispersal and maintenance of the habitat are considered equally important (Ott 1987). While wind, heavy rain or large animals may detach whole thalli or thallus pieces, small herbivoressuch as snails, slugs, mites or insects may cause physical damage by grazing systematically on whole lobes or particular thallus parts. In this way, herbivores can decimate preferred species or limit their thallus growth (Lawrey 1983; Froberg et al. 1993, 2006; Baur et al. 1994, 1995, 2000; Benesperi & Tretiach 2004; Asplund & Gauslaa 2008; Asplund et al. 2010; Asplund 2011). In the case of Lobaria pulmonaria (L.) Hoffm., it seems that grazing invertebrates may reduce populations of recently establishedyoung thalli (Asplund & Gauslaa 2008), but grazing damage does not necessarily change growth rates of this species if growth zones are not affected (Gauslaa et al. 2006). There has been considerable research on regeneration of structures developed afterartificially caused damage (Henssen & Jahns 1974; Armstrong 1979, 2010; Honeg-ger 1996a; Honegger et al. 1996). Moreover, studies assessing wounds caused by grazing snails have revealed that different lichen species respond with the same regeneration process; in both cases they activate lobe pri-mordia along wound margins and start with the formation of secondary lobes (Baur et al. 2000; Froberg et al. 2006). A few studies suggest that regenerative abilities of lichens might have the potential to restructure new thalli from fragments that have survived the gut passage of feeding invertebrates (Froberg et al. 2001; Meier et al. 2002; Boch et al. 2011). However, evidence for successful generation under field conditions is lacking.
机译:在具有竞争性生态策略的地衣中,栖息地的繁殖,扩散和维持被认为同样重要(Ott 1987)。风,大雨或大型动物可能会使整个沙丘或沙丘碎片分离,而小的食草动物,如蜗牛,,螨虫或昆虫,可能会通过有组织地掠食整个叶或特定的沙丘部位而造成物理损害。通过这种方式,草食动物可以消灭优选的物种或限制其种群的繁殖(Lawrey 1983; Froberg等1993,2006; Baur等1994,1995,2000; Benesperi&Tretiach 2004; Asplund&Gauslaa 2008; Asplund等2008。 2010; Asplund 2011)。就霍巴特氏菌而言,无脊椎动物的放牧似乎会减少最近建立的幼thalli的种群(Asplund&Gauslaa 2008),但是如果不影响生长区,放牧的破坏并不一定会改变该物种的生长速度。 (Gauslaa et al.2006)。在人为造成的破坏之后,结构的再生已经得到了相当多的研究(Henssen&Jahns 1974; Armstrong 1979,2010; Honeg-ger 1996a; Honegger等人1996)。此外,评估由放牧的蜗牛造成的伤口的研究表明,不同的地衣物种对相同的再生过程有反应。在这两种情况下,它们都沿着伤口边缘激活先天性叶片,并从次级叶片的形成开始(Baur等,2000; Froberg等,2006)。一些研究表明,地衣的再生能力可能具有从无脊椎动物摄食的肠道中幸存下来的碎片中重组新thalli的潜力(Froberg等人,2001; Meier等人,2002; Boch等人,2011)。但是,缺乏在野外条件下成功生成的证据。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号