首页> 外文期刊>The lancet oncology >Homoharringtonine-based induction regimens for patients with de-novo acute myeloid leukaemia: A multicentre, open-label, randomised, controlled phase 3 trial
【24h】

Homoharringtonine-based induction regimens for patients with de-novo acute myeloid leukaemia: A multicentre, open-label, randomised, controlled phase 3 trial

机译:新型急性髓样白血病患者的基于同型harringtoningine的诱导方案:一项多中心,开放标签,随机,对照的3期试验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: Homoharringtonine-based induction regimens have been widely used in China for patients with acute myeloid leukaemia. However, their efficacy has not been tested in a multicentre randomised controlled trial in a large population. We assessed the efficacy and safety of homoharringtonine-based induction treatment for management of newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukaemia. Methods: This open-label, randomised, controlled, phase 3 study was done in 17 institutions in China between September, 2007, and July, 2011. Untreated patients aged 14-59 years with acute myeloid leukaemia were randomly assigned (by a computer-generated allocation schedule without stratification) to receive one of three induction regimens in a 1:1:1 ratio: homoharringtonine 2 mg/m2 per day on days 1-7, cytarabine 100 mg/m2 per day on days 1-7, and aclarubicin 20 mg/day on days 1-7 (HAA); homoharringtonine 2 mg/m2 per day on days 1-7, cytarabine 100 mg/m2 per day on days 1-7, and daunorubicin 40 mg/m2 per day on days 1-3 (HAD); or daunorubicin 40-45 mg/m2 per day on days 1-3 and cytarabine 100 mg/m2 per day on days 1-7 (DA). Patients in complete remission were offered two cycles of intermediate-dose cytarabine (2 g/m2 every 12 h on days 1-3). The primary endpoints were the proportion of patients who achieved complete remission after two cycles of induction treatment and event-free survival in the intention-to-treat population. The trial is registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Register, number ChiCTR-TRC-06000054. Findings: We enrolled 620 patients, of whom 609 were included in the intention-to-treat analysis. 150 of 206 patients (73%) in the HAA group achieved complete remission versus 125 of 205 (61%) in the DA group (p=0·0108); 3-year event-free survival was 35·4% (95% CI 28·6-42·2) versus 23·1% (95% CI 17·4-29·3; p=0·0023). 133 of 198 patients (67%) in the HAD group had complete remission (vs DA, p=0·20) and 3-year event-free survival was 32·7% (95% CI 26·1-39·5; vs DA, p=0·08). Adverse events were much the same in all groups, except that more patients in the HAA (12 of 206 [5·8%]) and HAD (13 of 198 [6·6%]) groups died within 30 days than in the DA group (two of 205 [1%]; p=0·0067 vs HAA; p=0·0030 vs HAD). Interpretation: A regimen of homoharringtonine, cytarabine, and aclarubicin is a treatment option for young, newly diagnosed patients with acute myeloid leukaemia. Funding: Chinese National High Tech Programme, Key Special Research Foundation of the Ministry of Science and Technology of China, National Nature Science Foundation of China, National Clinical Key Specialty Construction Project.
机译:背景:基于同型harringtonine的诱导方案已在中国广泛用于急性髓细胞性白血病患者。但是,尚未在大量人群的多中心随机对照试验中测试其功效。我们评估了基于同型harringtonine的诱导疗法治疗新诊断的急性髓细胞性白血病的疗效和安全性。方法:这项开放标签,随机,对照的3期研究于2007年9月至2011年7月在中国的17家机构中进行。将14-59岁的急性髓性白血病未经治疗的患者随机分配(通过计算机-生成的分配时间表而不分层)来以1:1:1的比例接受三种诱导方案之一:在第1-7天每天每天服用2毫克/平方米的高纯harringtonine,在第1-7天每天每天服用100毫克/平方米的阿糖胞苷和阿克拉比星第1-7天(HAA)为20毫克/天;在第1-7天每天2毫克/平方米高纯harringtonine,在第1-7天每天1毫克阿糖胞苷,每天1-3天服用柔红霉素40毫克/平方米(HAD);或第1至3天每天服用柔红霉素40-45 mg / m2,第1至7天每天服用阿糖胞苷100 mg / m2(DA)。向完全缓解的患者提供两个周期的中剂量阿糖胞苷(第1-3天每12小时2 g / m2)。主要终点是在意向性治疗人群中经过两个周期的诱导治疗和无事件生存后完全缓解的患者比例。该试验已在中国临床试验注册簿中注册,编号为ChiCTR-TRC-06000054。结果:我们招募了620名患者,其中609名患者参加了意向治疗分析。 HAA组的206名患者中有150名(73%)完全缓解,而DA组的205名中有125名(61%)得到了完全缓解(p = 0·0108); 3年无事件生存率为35·4%(95%CI 28·6-42·2),而23·1%(95%CI 17·4-29·3; p = 0·0023)。 HAD组198例患者中有133例(67%)完全缓解(vs DA,p = 0·20),三年无事件生存率为32·7%(95%CI 26·1-39·5;相对于DA,p = 0·08)。不良事件在所有组中几乎相同,除了在30天内死亡的HAA组(206个中的12个,占[5·8%])和HAD组(198个中的13个,[6·6%])比DA死亡的多。组(205人中有2人[1%]; vs HAA为p = 0·0067; vs HAD为p = 0·0030)。解释:对于新近诊断出的急性髓性白血病的年轻患者,高纯,阿糖胞苷和阿克拉比星的治疗方案是一种治疗选择。资助项目:国家高技术计划,科学技术部重点专项研究基金,国家自然科学基金,国家临床重点专项建设项目。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号