首页> 外文期刊>The Library Quarterly: A Journal of Investigation and Discussion in the Field of Library Science >Libraries, Electronic Resources, and Privacy: The Case for Positive Intellectual Freedom
【24h】

Libraries, Electronic Resources, and Privacy: The Case for Positive Intellectual Freedom

机译:图书馆,电子资源和隐私:积极的知识自由的案例

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Public and research libraries have long provided resources in electronic formats, and the tension between providing electronic resources and patron privacy is widely recognized. But assessing trade-offs between privacy and access to electronic resources remains difficult. One reason is a conceptual problem regarding intellectual freedom. Traditionally, the LIS literature has plausibly understood privacy as a facet of intellectual freedom. However, while certain types of electronic resource use may diminish patron privacy, thereby diminishing intellectual freedom, the opportunities created by such resources also appear liberty enhancing. Adjudicating between privacy loss and enhanced opportunities on intellectual freedom grounds must therefore provide an account of intellectual freedom capable of addressing both privacy and opportunity. I will argue that intellectual freedom is a form of positive freedom, where a person’s freedom is a function of the quality of her agency. Using this view as the lodestar, I articulate several principles for assessing adoption of electronic resources and privacy protections.
机译:公共图书馆和研究图书馆长期以来一直以电子格式提供资源,提供电子资源与顾客隐私之间的紧张关系已广为人知。但是,评估隐私和访问电子资源之间的权衡仍然很困难。原因之一是关于知识自由的概念性问题。传统上,LIS文献似乎将隐私理解为知识自由的一个方面。然而,尽管某些类型的电子资源使用可能会减少顾客的隐私,从而减少知识自由,但此类资源所创造的机会也会显得自由。因此,在基于知识自由的基础上对隐私权丧失和增加的机会进行裁定时,必须提供一种能够解决隐私和机会的知识自由问题。我将辩称,知识自由是积极自由的一种形式,其中一个人的自由取决于其代理机构的素质。我以这种观点为代表,阐述了评估电子资源和隐私保护的采用的几项原则。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号