【24h】

Queering the catalog: Queer theory and the politics of correction

机译:查寻目录:查尔斯理论和更正政治

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Critiques of hegemonic library classification structures and controlled vocabularies have a rich history in information studies. This project has pointed out the trouble with classification and cataloging decisions that are framed as objective and neutral but are always ideological and worked to correct bias in library structures. Viewing knowledge organization systems from a queer perspective, however, challenges the idea that classification and subject language can ever be finally corrected. Engaging queer theory and library classification and cataloging together requires new ways of thinking about how to be ethically and politically engaged on behalf of marginal knowledge formations and identities who quite reasonably expect to be able to locate themselves in the library. Queer theory invites a shift in responsibility from catalogers, positioned to offer functional solutions, to public services librarians, who can teach patrons to dialogically engage the catalog as a complex and biased text, just as critical catalogers do.
机译:霸权图书馆分类结构和受控词汇的批判在信息研究中具有丰富的历史。该项目指出了分类和编目决策的麻烦,这些决策被认为是客观和中立的,但始终是意识形态的,并且可以纠正图书馆结构中的偏见。但是,从同志的角度来看知识组织系统,对分类和主题语言可以最终得到纠正的观点提出了挑战。将酷儿理论与图书馆分类和分类结合在一起,需要新的思维方式,以如何代表边缘知识形式和身份在道德和政治上参与,这些边缘知识形式和身份非常合理地期望能够在图书馆中找到自己的位置。酷儿理论促使责任从定位为提供功能解决方案的编目转移到公共服务馆员,后者可以教顾客像复杂的编目员一样,以对话的形式将目录编入复杂而有偏见的文本。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号