...
首页> 外文期刊>The lancet oncology >Charged particle therapy versus photon therapy for paranasal sinus and nasal cavity malignant diseases: A systematic review and meta-analysis
【24h】

Charged particle therapy versus photon therapy for paranasal sinus and nasal cavity malignant diseases: A systematic review and meta-analysis

机译:带电粒子治疗与光子治疗鼻旁窦和鼻腔恶性疾病:系统评价和荟萃分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: Malignant tumours arising within the nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses are rare and composed of several histological types, rendering controlled clinical trials to establish the best treatment impractical. We undertook a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the clinical outcomes of patients treated with charged particle therapy with those of individuals receiving photon therapy. Methods: We identified studies of nasal cavity and paranasal sinus tumours through searches of databases including Embase, Medline, Scopus, and the Cochrane Collaboration. We included treatment-naive cohorts (both primary and adjuvant radiation therapy) and those with recurrent disease. Primary outcomes of interest were overall survival, disease-free survival, and locoregional control, at 5 years and at longest follow-up. We used random-effect models to pool outcomes across studies and compared event rates of combined outcomes for charged particle therapy and photon therapy using an interaction test. Findings: 43 cohorts from 41 non-comparative observational studies were included. Median follow-up for the charged particle therapy group was 38 months (range 5-73) and for the photon therapy group was 40 months (14-97). Pooled overall survival was significantly higher at 5 years for charged particle therapy than for photon therapy (relative risk 1·51, 95% CI 1·14-1·99; p=0·0038) and at longest follow-up (1·27, 1·01-1·59; p=0·037). At 5 years, disease-free survival was significantly higher for charged particle therapy than for photon therapy (1·93, 1·36-2·75, p=0·0003) but, at longest follow-up, this event rate did not differ between groups (1·51, 1·00-2·30; p=0·052). Locoregional control did not differ between treatment groups at 5 years (1·06, 0·68-1·67; p=0·79) but it was higher for charged particle therapy than for photon therapy at longest follow-up (1·18, 1·01-1·37; p=0·031). A subgroup analysis comparing proton beam therapy with intensity-modulated radiation therapy showed significantly higher disease-free survival at 5 years (relative risk 1·44, 95% CI 1·01-2·05; p=0·045) and locoregional control at longest follow-up (1·26, 1·05-1·51; p=0·011). Interpretation: Compared with photon therapy, charged particle therapy could be associated with better outcomes for patients with malignant diseases of the nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses. Prospective studies emphasising collection of patient-reported and functional outcomes are strongly encouraged.
机译:背景:鼻腔和鼻旁窦内发生的恶性肿瘤很少见,并且由几种组织学类型组成,因此进行临床对照试验以建立最佳治疗方法是不切实际的。我们进行了系统的审查和荟萃分析,以比较接受带电粒子治疗的患者和接受光子治疗的患者的临床结局。方法:通过搜索包括Embase,Medline,Scopus和Cochrane协作数据库在内的数据库,我们确定了鼻腔和鼻旁窦肿瘤的研究。我们纳入了未接受过治疗的人群(主要和辅助放疗)和复发性人群。感兴趣的主要结局是5年和最长随访时间的总体生存期,无病生存期和局部区域控制。我们使用随机效应模型汇总了各个研究的结果,并使用交互作用测试比较了带电粒子治疗和光子治疗的合并结果事件发生率。结果:包括来自41个非比较性观察研究的43个队列。带电粒子治疗组的中位随访时间为38个月(范围5-73),而光子治疗组的中位随访时间为40个月(14-97)。荷电粒子疗法在5年时的总总体生存率显着高于光子疗法(相对风险1·51,95%CI 1·14-1·99; p = 0·0038),并且随访时间最长(1· 27,1·01-1·59; p = 0·037)。在5年时,带电粒子疗法的无病生存期显着高于光子疗法(1·93、1·36-2·75,p = 0·0003),但在最长的随访中,该事件发生率组之间没有差异(1·51,1·00-2·30; p = 0·052)。各治疗组在5年时的局部区域控制无差异(1·06,0·68-1·67; p = 0·79),但在最长的随访时间中,带电粒子疗法比光子疗法更高(1· 18,1·01-1·37; p = 0·031)。将质子束疗法与强度调节放射疗法进行比较的亚组分析显示,5年无病生存率显着更高(相对风险1·44,95%CI 1·01-2·05; p = 0·045)和局部区域控制最长的随访时间(1·26,1·05-1·51; p = 0·011)。解释:与光子疗法相比,带电荷粒子疗法可以使鼻腔和鼻旁窦恶性疾病的患者获得更好的预后。强烈建议进行前瞻性研究,强调收集患者报告和功能结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号